mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Every Language Model Has a Forgery-Resistant Signature

arXiv 2510.14086 ↗First posted 15 Oct 2025cs.CR cs.AIcited by 4

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

The ubiquity of closed-weight language models with public-facing APIs has generated interest in forensic methods, both for extracting hidden model details (e.g., parameters) and for identifying models by their outputs. One successful approach to these goals has been to exploit the geometric constraints imposed by the language model architecture and parameters. In this work, we show that a lesser-known geometric constraint -- namely, that language model outputs lie on the surface of a high-dimensional ellipse -- functions as a signature for the model and can be used to identify the source model of a given output. This ellipse signature has unique properties that distinguish it from existing model-output association methods like language model fingerprints. In particular, the signature is hard to forge: without direct access to model parameters, it is practically infeasible to produce log-probabilities (logprobs) on the ellipse using currently known methods. Secondly, the signature is naturally occurring, since all language models have these elliptical constraints. Thirdly, the signature is self-contained, in that it is detectable without access to the model inputs or the full weights. Finally, the signature is compact and redundant, as it is independently detectable in each logprob output from the model. We evaluate a novel technique for extracting the ellipse from small models and discuss the practical hurdles that make it infeasible for production-scale models. Finally, we use ellipse signatures to propose a protocol for language model output verification, analogous to cryptographic symmetric-key message authentication systems.

Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 23 of its 30 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 15 Oct 2025.

Builds on

23 of 30 references.

References · 23

  1. 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 60,361
  2. 2016Layer Normalizationcited by 5,669
  3. 2020The Pile: An 800GB Dataset of Diverse Text for Language Modelingcited by 2,411
  4. 2019Root Mean Square Layer Normalizationcited by 1,480
  5. 2023DetectGPT: Zero-Shot Machine-Generated Text Detection using Probability Curvaturecited by 726
  6. 2023A Watermark for Large Language Modelscited by 725
  7. 2022GPT-NeoX-20B: An Open-Source Autoregressive Language Modelcited by 713
  8. 2023TinyStories: How Small Can Language Models Be and Still Speak Coherent English?cited by 449
  9. 2023Undetectable Watermarks for Language Modelscited by 226
  10. 2024Stealing Part of a Production Language Modelcited by 159
  11. 2023A Survey of Text Watermarking in the Era of Large Language Modelscited by 112
  12. 2022Untargeted Backdoor Watermark: Towards Harmless and Stealthy Dataset Copyright Protectioncited by 86
11 more
  1. 2023Effective Prompt Extraction from Language Modelscited by 85
  2. 2023Language Model Inversioncited by 68
  3. 2024zkLLM: Zero Knowledge Proofs for Large Language Modelscited by 51
  4. 2024Logits of API-Protected LLMs Leak Proprietary Informationcited by 40
  5. 2023HuRef: HUman-REadable Fingerprint for Large Language Modelscited by 34
  6. 2024A Fingerprint for Large Language Modelscited by 28
  7. 2024Learning to Watermark LLM-generated Text via Reinforcement Learningcited by 22
  8. 2025Copyright Protection for Large Language Models: A Survey of Methods, Challenges, and Trendscited by 20
  9. 2025Robust Data Watermarking in Language Models by Injecting Fictitious Knowledgecited by 12
  10. 2025Better Language Model Inversion by Compactly Representing Next-Token Distributionscited by 9
  11. 2025CoTSRF: Utilize Chain of Thought as Stealthy and Robust Fingerprint of Large Language Modelscited by 7

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 4.

4 papers.