mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Hierarchical Frequency Tagging Probe (HFTP): A Unified Approach to Investigate Syntactic Structure Representations in Large Language Models and the Human Brain

arXiv 2510.13255 ↗First posted 15 Oct 2025cs.CL cs.NEcited by 2

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Large Language Models (LLMs) demonstrate human-level or even superior language abilities, effectively modeling syntactic structures, yet the specific computational modules responsible remain unclear. A key question is whether LLM behavioral capabilities stem from mechanisms akin to those in the human brain. To address these questions, we introduce the Hierarchical Frequency Tagging Probe (HFTP), a tool that utilizes frequency-domain analysis to identify neuron-wise components of LLMs (e.g., individual Multilayer Perceptron (MLP) neurons) and cortical regions (via intracranial recordings) encoding syntactic structures. Our results show that models such as GPT-2, Gemma, Gemma 2, Llama 2, Llama 3.1, and GLM-4 process syntax in analogous layers, while the human brain relies on distinct cortical regions for different syntactic levels. Representational similarity analysis reveals a stronger alignment between LLM representations and the left hemisphere of the brain (dominant in language processing). Notably, upgraded models exhibit divergent trends: Gemma 2 shows greater brain similarity than Gemma, while Llama 3.1 shows less alignment with the brain compared to Llama 2. These findings offer new insights into the interpretability of LLM behavioral improvements, raising questions about whether these advancements are driven by human-like or non-human-like mechanisms, and establish HFTP as a valuable tool bridging computational linguistics and cognitive neuroscience. This project is available at https://github.com/LilTiger/HFTP.

Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 20 of its 68 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 15 Oct 2025.

Builds on

20 of 68 references.

References · 20

  1. 2023GPT-4 Technical Reportcited by 18,132
  2. 2024The Llama 3 Herd of Modelscited by 14,192
  3. 2023Llama 2: Open Foundation and Fine-Tuned Chat Modelscited by 12,865
  4. 2024Gemma 2: Improving Open Language Models at a Practical Sizecited by 1,928
  5. 2024ChatGLM: A Family of Large Language Models from GLM-130B to GLM-4 All Toolscited by 1,096
  6. 2019BERT Rediscovers the Classical NLP Pipelinecited by 1,046
  7. 2019What Does BERT Look At? An Analysis of BERT's Attentioncited by 994
  8. 2024Gemma: Open Models Based on Gemini Research and Technologycited by 889
  9. 2019Right for the Wrong Reasons: Diagnosing Syntactic Heuristics in Natural Language Inferencecited by 864
  10. 2021Knowledge Neurons in Pretrained Transformerscited by 590
  11. 2022Transformer Feed-Forward Layers Build Predictions by Promoting Concepts in the Vocabulary Spacecited by 522
  12. 2016Assessing the Ability of LSTMs to Learn Syntax-Sensitive Dependenciescited by 350
8 more
  1. 2023Adapted Large Language Models Can Outperform Medical Experts in Clinical Text Summarizationcited by 244
  2. 2024Language-Specific Neurons: The Key to Multilingual Capabilities in Large Language Modelscited by 124
  3. 2019UER: An Open-Source Toolkit for Pre-training Modelscited by 61
  4. 2023Exploring Human-Like Translation Strategy with Large Language Modelscited by 44
  5. 2021Disentangling Syntax and Semantics in the Brain with Deep Networkscited by 39
  6. 2022Joint processing of linguistic properties in brains and language modelscited by 37
  7. 2024Potential and Limitations of LLMs in Capturing Structured Semantics: A Case Study on SRLcited by 10
  8. 2017Lexical representation explains cortical entrainment during speech comprehensioncited by 1

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 1; 2026: 1.

2 papers.