mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

On efficiently computable functions, deep networks and sparse compositionality

arXiv 2510.11942 ↗First posted 13 Oct 2025cs.LGcited by 3

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

We show that efficient Turing computability at any fixed input/output precision implies the existence of compositionally sparse (bounded-fan-in, polynomial-size) DAG representations and of corresponding neural approximants achieving the target precision. Concretely: if f:[0,1]d→Rm is computable in time polynomial in the bit-depths, then for every pair of precisions (n,mout) there exists a bounded-fan-in Boolean circuit of size and depth poly(n+mout) computing the discretized map; replacing each gate by a constant-size neural emulator yields a deep network of size/depth poly(n+mout) that achieves accuracy varepsilon=2^-mout. We also relate these constructions to compositional approximation rates citeMhaskarPoggio2016b,poggiodeepshallow2017,Poggio2017,Poggio2023HowDS and to optimization viewed as hierarchical search over sparse structures.

Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 4 of its 11 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 13 Oct 2025.

Builds on

4 of 11 references.

References · 4

  1. 2016Benefits of depth in neural networkscited by 250
  2. 2015The Power of Depth for Feedforward Neural Networkscited by 183
  3. 2016Why and When Can Deep -- but Not Shallow -- Networks Avoid the Curse of Dimensionality: a Reviewcited by 155
  4. 2023Auto-Regressive Next-Token Predictors are Universal Learnerscited by 67

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 3.

3 papers.