Z0-Inf: Zeroth Order Approximation for Data Influence
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
A critical aspect of analyzing and improving modern machine learning systems lies in understanding how individual training examples influence a model's predictive behavior. Estimating this influence enables critical applications, including data selection and model debugging; in particular, self-influence, which quantifies the influence of a training point on itself, has found many uses in data quality assessment and outlier detection. Existing methods for measuring data influence, however, are often impractical for large models due to low accuracy or prohibitive computational costs: most approaches either provide poor approximations or rely on gradients and inverse-Hessian computations that remain challenging to scale. In this work, we introduce a highly efficient zeroth-order approximation for estimating the influence of training data that requires only a fraction of the time and memory footprint of prior methods. Notably, our method relies solely on loss values of intermediate checkpoints on the training and test data, along with the checkpoints themselves, making it broadly applicable even when the loss function of interest is non-differentiable. Beyond its computational efficiency, our approach achieves superior accuracy in estimating self-influence and comparable or improved accuracy in estimating train-test influence for fine-tuned large language models, enabling scalable and practical analysis of how training data shapes model behavior.
Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 20 of its 28 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 13 Oct 2025.
Builds on
20 of 28 references.
References · 20
- 2021Training Verifiers to Solve Math Word Problemscited by 10,109
- 2021Measuring Mathematical Problem Solving With the MATH Datasetcited by 5,371
- 2017Understanding Black-box Predictions via Influence Functionscited by 1,741
- 2019Data Shapley: Equitable Valuation of Data for Machine Learningcited by 629
- 2020Estimating Training Data Influence by Tracing Gradient Descentcited by 580
- 2024LESS: Selecting Influential Data for Targeted Instruction Tuningcited by 532
- 2020What Neural Networks Memorize and Why: Discovering the Long Tail via Influence Estimationcited by 497
- 2017Deep Layer Aggregationcited by 436
- 2023Studying Large Language Model Generalization with Influence Functionscited by 326
- 2023TRAK: Attributing Model Behavior at Scalecited by 283
- 2020Influence Functions in Deep Learning Are Fragilecited by 252
- 2021Scaling Up Influence Functionscited by 132
8 more
- 2023DataInf: Efficiently Estimating Data Influence in LoRA-tuned LLMs and Diffusion Modelscited by 123
- 2024Data Shapley in One Training Runcited by 81
- 2019Data Cleansing for Models Trained with SGDcited by 67
- 2021Revisiting Methods for Finding Influential Examplescited by 39
- 2024Training Data Attribution via Approximate Unrolled Differentiationcited by 34
- 2023Theoretical and Practical Perspectives on what Influence Functions Docited by 29
- 2024Do Influence Functions Work on Large Language Models?cited by 20
- 2024textttdattri: A Library for Efficient Data Attributioncited by 18
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 3.
3 papers.
- 2026Sketching the Readout of Large Language Models for Scalable Data Attribution and Valuationcited by 1
- 2026From Detrimental to Beneficial: Dynamic Influence-based Valuation and Editingcited by 0
- 2026Not All Rollouts Are Worth Learning: On Trajectory Valuation for Post-Training Reinforcement Learningcited by 0
- 2026Not All Rollouts Are Worth Learning: On Trajectory Valuation for Post-Training Reinforcement Learning28 Sep 2026
- 2026From Detrimental to Beneficial: Dynamic Influence-based Valuation and Editing23 Aug 2026
- 2026Sketching the Readout of Large Language Models for Scalable Data Attribution and Valuation17 Apr 2026