How many samples to label for an application given a foundation model? Chest X-ray classification study
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Chest X-ray classification is vital yet resource-intensive, typically demanding extensive annotated data for accurate diagnosis. Foundation models mitigate this reliance, but how many labeled samples are required remains unclear. We systematically evaluate the use of power-law fits to predict the training size necessary for specific ROC-AUC thresholds. Testing multiple pathologies and foundation models, we find XrayCLIP and XraySigLIP achieve strong performance with significantly fewer labeled examples than a ResNet-50 baseline. Importantly, learning curve slopes from just 50 labeled cases accurately forecast final performance plateaus. Our results enable practitioners to minimize annotation costs by labeling only the essential samples for targeted performance.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 8 of its 18 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 13 Oct 2025.
Builds on
8 of 18 references.
References · 8
- 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 52,096
- 2021Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervisioncited by 33,744
- 2023DINOv2: Learning Robust Visual Features without Supervisioncited by 7,974
- 2023Sigmoid Loss for Language Image Pre-Trainingcited by 3,109
- 2017Deep Learning Scaling is Predictable, Empiricallycited by 582
- 2021RadGraph: Extracting Clinical Entities and Relations from Radiology Reportscited by 319
- 2020Optimal Regularization Can Mitigate Double Descentcited by 109
- 2020Learning Curves for Analysis of Deep Networkscited by 20
Built on by
Not cited yet.