mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Principles of Safe AI Companions for Youth: Parent and Expert Perspectives

arXiv 2510.11185 ↗First posted 13 Oct 2025cs.HCcited by 6

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

AI companions are increasingly popular among teenagers, yet current platforms lack safeguards to address developmental risks and harmful normalization. Despite growing concerns, little is known about how parents and developmental psychology experts assess these interactions or what protections they consider necessary. We conducted 26 semi structured interviews with parents and experts, who reviewed real world youth GenAI companion conversation snippets. We found that stakeholders assessed risks contextually, attending to factors such as youth maturity, AI character age, and how AI characters modeled values and norms. We also identified distinct logics of assessment: parents flagged single events, such as a mention of suicide or flirtation, as high risk, whereas experts looked for patterns over time, such as repeated references to self harm or sustained dependence. Both groups proposed interventions, with parents favoring broader oversight and experts preferring cautious, crisis-only escalation paired with youth facing safeguards. These findings provide directions for embedding safety into AI companion design.

Key facts. Cited by 6 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 13 Oct 2025.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 1; 2026: 5.

6 papers.