G2L:From Giga-Scale to Cancer-Specific Large-Scale Pathology Foundation Models via Knowledge Distillation
On the map: Knowledge distillation → Distillation for medical imaging
Abstract (arXiv)
Recent studies in pathology foundation models have shown that scaling training data, diversifying cancer types, and increasing model size consistently improve their performance. However, giga-scale foundation models, which are trained on hundreds of thousands of slides covering tens of cancer types and contain billions of parameters, pose significant challenges for practical use due to their tremendous computational costs in both development and deployment. In this work, we present a novel strategy, named the G2L framework, to increase the performance of large-scale foundation models, which consist of only 15% of the parameters of giga-scale models, to a comparable performance level of giga-scale models in cancer-specific tasks. Our approach applies knowledge distillation, transferring the capabilities of a giga-scale model to a large-scale model, using just 1K pathology slides of a target cancer (e.g., breast, prostate, etc.). The resulting distilled model not only outperformed state-of-the-art models of the same size (i.e., large-scale) across several benchmarks but also, interestingly, surpassed the giga-scale teacher and huge-scale models in some benchmarks. In addition, the distilled model exhibited a higher robustness index, indicating improved resilience to image variations originating from multiple institutions. These findings suggest that the proposed distillation approach for a large-scale model is a data- and parameter-efficient way to achieve giga-scale-level performance for cancer-specific applications without prohibitive computational burden.
Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Distillation for medical imaging, one of 12 directions in Knowledge distillation. Builds on 15 of its 30 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 13 Oct 2025.
Builds on
15 of 30 references.
References · 15
- 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 37,240
- 2020An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scalecited by 30,186
- 2020A Simple Framework for Contrastive Learning of Visual Representationscited by 12,049
- 2023DINOv2: Learning Robust Visual Features without Supervisioncited by 7,974
- 2021Masked Autoencoders Are Scalable Vision Learnerscited by 7,403
- 2021Emerging Properties in Self-Supervised Vision Transformerscited by 6,968
- 2019Similarity of Neural Network Representations Revisitedcited by 1,755
- 2021iBOT: Image BERT Pre-Training with Online Tokenizercited by 903
- 2024Virchow2: Scaling Self-Supervised Mixed Magnification Models in Pathologycited by 161
- 2021BRACS: A Dataset for BReAst Carcinoma Subtyping in H&E Histology Imagescited by 132
- 2024Hibou: A Family of Foundational Vision Transformers for Pathologycited by 57
- 2025Current Pathology Foundation Models are unrobust to Medical Center Differencescited by 39
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 2.
2 papers.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2024Towards A Generalizable Pathology Foundation Model via Unified Knowledge Distillation
- 2024Knowledge-enhanced Pretraining for Vision-language Pathology Foundation Model on Cancer Diagnosis
- 2024Benchmarking foundation models as feature extractors for weakly-supervised computational pathology
- 2025Pathryoshka: Compressing Pathology Foundation Models via Multi-Teacher Knowledge Distillation with Nested Embeddings
- 2026Momentum Memory for Knowledge Distillation in Computational Pathology
- 2025Teaching pathology foundation models to accurately predict gene expression with parameter efficient knowledge transfer
- 2025Multi-Modal Foundation Models for Computational Pathology: A Survey
- 2026BigCell: Generating Gigapixel Whole-Slide Images