Robust Exploratory Stopping under Ambiguity in Reinforcement Learning
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
We propose and analyze a continuous-time robust reinforcement learning framework for optimal stopping under ambiguity. In this framework, an agent chooses a robust exploratory stopping time motivated by two objectives: robust decision-making under ambiguity and learning about the unknown environment. Here, ambiguity refers to considering multiple probability measures dominated by a reference measure, reflecting the agent's awareness that the reference measure representing her learned belief about the environment would be erroneous. Using the g-expectation framework, we reformulate the optimal stopping problem under ambiguity as a robust exploratory control problem with Bernoulli distributed controls. We then characterize the optimal Bernoulli distributed control via backward stochastic differential equations and, based on this, construct the robust exploratory stopping time that approximates the optimal stopping time under ambiguity. Last, we establish a policy iteration theorem and implement it as a reinforcement learning algorithm. Numerical experiments demonstrate the convergence, robustness, and scalability of our reinforcement learning algorithm across different levels of ambiguity and exploration.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 25 of its 75 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 11 Oct 2025.
Builds on
25 of 75 references.
References · 25
- 2025DeepSeek-R1: Incentivizing Reasoning Capability in LLMs via Reinforcement Learningcited by 6,146
- 2015End-to-End Training of Deep Visuomotor Policiescited by 847
- 2017DGM: A deep learning algorithm for solving partial differential equationscited by 674
- 2017Solving high-dimensional partial differential equations using deep learningcited by 549
- 2017Robust Adversarial Reinforcement Learningcited by 439
- 2020Robust Deep Reinforcement Learning against Adversarial Perturbations on State Observationscited by 235
- 2022Robust Reinforcement Learning using Offline Datacited by 95
- 2021Policy Gradient and Actor-Critic Learning in Continuous Time and Space: Theory and Algorithmscited by 76
- 2022q-Learning in Continuous Timecited by 68
- 2021Policy Evaluation and Temporal-Difference Learning in Continuous Time and Space: A Martingale Approachcited by 62
- 2016Transfer from Simulation to Real World through Learning Deep Inverse Dynamics Modelcited by 53
- 2019Deep splitting method for parabolic PDEscited by 53
13 more
- 2017Reinforcement Learning under Model Mismatchcited by 52
- 2023Double Pessimism is Provably Efficient for Distributionally Robust Offline Reinforcement Learning: Generic Algorithm and Robust Partial Coveragecited by 51
- 2021Exploratory HJB equations and their convergencecited by 28
- 2019Solving high-dimensional optimal stopping problems using deep learningcited by 21
- 2020Approximation error analysis of some deep backward schemes for nonlinear PDEscited by 20
- 2022Randomized Optimal Stopping Problem in Continuous time and Reinforcement Learning Algorithmcited by 12
- 2024Full error analysis of the random deep splitting method for nonlinear parabolic PDEs and PIDEscited by 12
- 2022Convergence of Policy Iteration for Entropy-Regularized Stochastic Control Problemscited by 6
- 2024Learning to Optimally Stop Diffusion Processes, with Financial Applicationscited by 6
- 2024Exploratory Optimal Stopping: A Singular Control Formulationcited by 5
- 2023Sensitivity of robust optimization problems under drift and volatility uncertaintycited by 1
- 2024Numerical method for nonlinear Kolmogorov PDEs via sensitivity analysiscited by 1
- 2024Robust dividend policy: Equivalence of Epstein-Zin and Maenhout preferencescited by 1
Built on by
Not cited yet.