Mapping Semantic & Syntactic Relationships with Geometric Rotation
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Understanding how language and embedding models encode semantic relationships is fundamental to model interpretability. While early word embeddings exhibited intuitive vector arithmetic (''king'' - ''man'' + ''woman'' = ''queen''), modern high-dimensional text representations lack straightforward interpretable geometric properties. We introduce Rotor-Invariant Shift Estimation (RISE), a geometric approach that represents semantic-syntactic transformations as consistent rotational operations in embedding space, leveraging the manifold structure of modern language representations. RISE operations have the ability to operate across both languages and models without reducing performance, suggesting the existence of analogous cross-lingual geometric structure. We compare and evaluate RISE using two baseline methods, three embedding models, three datasets, and seven morphologically diverse languages in five major language groups. Our results demonstrate that RISE consistently maps discourse-level semantic-syntactic transformations with distinct grammatical features (e.g., negation and conditionality) across languages and models. This work provides the first demonstration that discourse-level semantic-syntactic transformations correspond to consistent geometric operations in multilingual embedding spaces, empirically supporting the linear representation hypothesis at the sentence level.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 39 of its 53 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 10 Oct 2025.
Builds on
39 of 53 references.
References · 39
- 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,204
- 2023GPT-4 Technical Reportcited by 18,132
- 2023Llama 2: Open Foundation and Fine-Tuned Chat Modelscited by 12,865
- 2019Sentence-BERT: Sentence Embeddings using Siamese BERT-Networkscited by 9,049
- 2013Efficient Estimation of Word Representations in Vector Spacecited by 4,346
- 2017Interpretability Beyond Feature Attribution: Quantitative Testing with Concept Activation Vectors (TCAV)cited by 1,309
- 2016Man is to Computer Programmer as Woman is to Homemaker? Debiasing Word Embeddingscited by 1,304
- 2016Understanding intermediate layers using linear classifier probescited by 1,279
- 2023Inference-Time Intervention: Eliciting Truthful Answers from a Language Modelcited by 1,259
- 2023Representation Engineering: A Top-Down Approach to AI Transparencycited by 1,239
- 2024M3-Embedding: Multi-Linguality, Multi-Functionality, Multi-Granularity Text Embeddings Through Self-Knowledge Distillationcited by 1,050
- 2023Steering Llama 2 via Contrastive Activation Additioncited by 1,009
27 more
- 2022Toy Models of Superpositioncited by 928
- 2021Probing Classifiers: Promises, Shortcomings, and Advancescited by 831
- 2020A Primer in BERTology: What we know about how BERT workscited by 807
- 2019How Contextual are Contextualized Word Representations? Comparing the Geometry of BERT, ELMo, and GPT-2 Embeddingscited by 770
- 2023The Linear Representation Hypothesis and the Geometry of Large Language Modelscited by 679
- 2019BLiMP: The Benchmark of Linguistic Minimal Pairs for Englishcited by 553
- 2022Transformer Feed-Forward Layers Build Predictions by Promoting Concepts in the Vocabulary Spacecited by 522
- 2018What you can cram into a single vector: Probing sentence embeddings for linguistic propertiescited by 452
- 2022Emergent World Representations: Exploring a Sequence Model Trained on a Synthetic Taskcited by 417
- 2023Emergent Linear Representations in World Models of Self-Supervised Sequence Modelscited by 313
- 2023In-context Vectors: Making In Context Learning More Effective and Controllable Through Latent Space Steeringcited by 240
- 2019Visualizing and Measuring the Geometry of BERTcited by 215
- 2024The Geometry of Categorical and Hierarchical Concepts in Large Language Modelscited by 151
- 2018A robust self-learning method for fully unsupervised cross-lingual mappings of word embeddingscited by 145
- 2024Analyzing the Generalization and Reliability of Steering Vectorscited by 130
- 2022State-of-the-art generalisation research in NLP: A taxonomy and reviewcited by 97
- 2023Language Models Implement Simple Word2Vec-style Vector Arithmeticcited by 97
- 2022The Geometry of Multilingual Language Model Representationscited by 94
- 2023Improving Activation Steering in Language Models with Mean-Centringcited by 64
- 2023Concept Algebra for (Score-Based) Text-Controlled Generative Modelscited by 59
- 2018Towards Understanding Linear Word Analogiescited by 57
- 2025Harnessing the Universal Geometry of Embeddingscited by 54
- 2021Probing BERT in Hyperbolic Spacescited by 50
- 2023Linear Spaces of Meanings: Compositional Structures in Vision-Language Modelscited by 48
- 2025A Unified Understanding and Evaluation of Steering Methodscited by 40
- 2024Householder Pseudo-Rotation: A Novel Approach to Activation Editing in LLMs with Direction-Magnitude Perspectivecited by 23
- 2023Uncovering Meanings of Embeddings via Partial Orthogonalitycited by 15
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.
1 paper.