mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Responsible AI Adoption in the Public Sector: A Data-Centric Taxonomy of AI Adoption Challenges

arXiv 2510.09634 ↗First posted 29 Sep 2025cs.CY cs.AIcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Despite Artificial Intelligence (AI) transformative potential for public sector services, decision-making, and administrative efficiency, adoption remains uneven due to complex technical, organizational, and institutional challenges. Responsible AI frameworks emphasize fairness, accountability, and transparency, aligning with principles of trustworthy AI and fair AI, yet remain largely aspirational, overlooking technical and institutional realities, especially foundational data and governance. This study addresses this gap by developing a taxonomy of data-related challenges to responsible AI adoption in government. Based on a systematic review of 43 studies and 21 expert evaluations, the taxonomy identifies 13 key challenges across technological, organizational, and environmental dimensions, including poor data quality, limited AI-ready infrastructure, weak governance, misalignment in human-AI decision-making, economic and environmental sustainability concerns. Annotated with institutional pressures, the taxonomy serves as a diagnostic tool to surface 'symptoms' of high-risk AI deployment and guides policymakers in building the institutional and data governance conditions necessary for responsible AI adoption.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 2 of its 42 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 29 Sep 2025.

Builds on

2 of 42 references.

References · 2

  1. 2019A Survey on Bias and Fairness in Machine Learningcited by 1,917
  2. 2023Connecting the Dots in Trustworthy Artificial Intelligence: From AI Principles, Ethics, and Key Requirements to Responsible AI Systems and Regulationcited by 61

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.

1 paper.