Hallucination Filtering in Radiology Vision-Language Models Using Discrete Semantic Entropy
On the map: Multimodal LLMs / vision-language models → Hallucination mitigation in LVLMs
Abstract (arXiv)
To determine whether using discrete semantic entropy (DSE) to reject questions likely to generate hallucinations can improve the accuracy of black-box vision-language models (VLMs) in radiologic image based visual question answering (VQA). This retrospective study evaluated DSE using two publicly available, de-identified datasets: the VQA-Med 2019 benchmark (500 images with clinical questions and short-text answers) and a diagnostic radiology dataset (206 cases: 60 computed tomography scans, 60 magnetic resonance images, 60 radiographs, 26 angiograms) with corresponding ground-truth diagnoses. GPT-4o and GPT-4.1 (Generative Pretrained Transformer; OpenAI) answered each question 15 times using a temperature of 1.0. Baseline accuracy was determined using low-temperature answers (temperature 0.1). Meaning-equivalent responses were grouped using bidirectional entailment checks, and DSE was computed from the relative frequencies of the resulting semantic clusters. Accuracy was recalculated after excluding questions with DSE > 0.6 or > 0.3. p-values and 95% confidence intervals were obtained using bootstrap resampling and a Bonferroni-corrected threshold of p < .004 for statistical significance. Across 706 image-question pairs, baseline accuracy was 51.7% for GPT-4o and 54.8% for GPT-4.1. After filtering out high-entropy questions (DSE > 0.3), accuracy on the remaining questions was 76.3% (retained questions: 334/706) for GPT-4o and 63.8% (retained questions: 499/706) for GPT-4.1 (both p < .001). Accuracy gains were observed across both datasets and largely remained statistically significant after Bonferroni correction. DSE enables reliable hallucination detection in black-box VLMs by quantifying semantic inconsistency. This method significantly improves diagnostic answer accuracy and offers a filtering strategy for clinical VLM applications.
Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Hallucination mitigation in LVLMs, one of 16 directions in Multimodal LLMs / vision-language models. Builds on 5 of its 26 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 10 Oct 2025.
Builds on
5 of 26 references.
Closest ancestors · 3
Same direction, newest first
- 2024RadFlag: A Black-Box Hallucination Detection Method for Medical Vision Language Models1 Nov
- 2023Detecting and Preventing Hallucinations in Large Vision Language Models11 Aug
- 2022MAP: Multimodal Uncertainty-Aware Vision-Language Pre-training Model11 Oct
Other references · 2
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 1; 2026: 1.
2 papers.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2025UniVRSE: Unified Vision-conditioned Response Semantic Entropy for Hallucination Detection in Medical Vision-Language Models
- 2026Deterministic Hallucination Detection in Medical VQA via Confidence-Evidence Bayesian Gain
- 2025CCD: Mitigating Hallucinations in Radiology MLLMs via Clinical Contrastive Decoding
- 2024Direct Preference Optimization for Suppressing Hallucinated Prior Exams in Radiology Report Generation
- 2024PhD: A ChatGPT-Prompted Visual hallucination Evaluation Dataset
- 2026HalluCXR: Benchmarking and Mitigating Hallucinations in Medical Vision-Language Models for Chest Radiograph Interpretation
- 2025MedHallTune: An Instruction-Tuning Benchmark for Mitigating Medical Hallucination in Vision-Language Models
- 2024MedVH: Towards Systematic Evaluation of Hallucination for Large Vision Language Models in the Medical Context