mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Prime Implicant Explanations for Reaction Feasibility Prediction

arXiv 2510.09226 ↗First posted 10 Oct 2025cs.LGcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Machine learning models that predict the feasibility of chemical reactions have become central to automated synthesis planning. Despite their predictive success, these models often lack transparency and interpretability. We introduce a novel formulation of prime implicant explanations--also known as minimally sufficient reasons--tailored to this domain, and propose an algorithm for computing such explanations in small-scale reaction prediction tasks. Preliminary experiments demonstrate that our notion of prime implicant explanations conservatively captures the ground truth explanations. That is, such explanations often contain redundant bonds and atoms but consistently capture the molecular attributes that are essential for predicting reaction feasibility.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 7 of its 28 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 10 Oct 2025.

Builds on

7 of 28 references.

References · 7

  1. 2018How Powerful are Graph Neural Networks?cited by 4,393
  2. 2019Optuna: A Next-generation Hyperparameter Optimization Frameworkcited by 2,501
  3. 2019Explanations can be manipulated and geometry is to blamecited by 216
  4. 2018A Symbolic Approach to Explaining Bayesian Network Classifierscited by 131
  5. 2017Predicting Organic Reaction Outcomes with Weisfeiler-Lehman Networkcited by 103
  6. 2020On The Reasons Behind Decisionscited by 100
  7. 2025Beyond Topological Self-Explainable GNNs: A Formal Explainability Perspectivecited by 11

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.

1 paper.