mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

DITING: A Multi-Agent Evaluation Framework for Benchmarking Web Novel Translation

arXiv 2510.09116 ↗First posted 10 Oct 2025cs.CLcited by 4

On the map: LLM agents and tool use → General LLM agent frameworks and benchmarks

Abstract (arXiv)

Large language models (LLMs) have substantially advanced machine translation (MT), yet their effectiveness in translating web novels remains unclear. Existing benchmarks rely on surface-level metrics that fail to capture the distinctive traits of this genre. To address these gaps, we introduce DITING, the first comprehensive evaluation framework for web novel translation, assessing narrative and cultural fidelity across six dimensions: idiom translation, lexical ambiguity, terminology localization, tense consistency, zero-pronoun resolution, and cultural safety, supported by over 18K expert-annotated Chinese-English sentence pairs. We further propose AgentEval, a reasoning-driven multi-agent evaluation framework that simulates expert deliberation to assess translation quality beyond lexical overlap, achieving the highest correlation with human judgments among seven tested automatic metrics. To enable metric comparison, we develop MetricAlign, a meta-evaluation dataset of 300 sentence pairs annotated with error labels and scalar quality scores. Comprehensive evaluation of fourteen open, closed, and commercial models reveals that Chinese-trained LLMs surpass larger foreign counterparts, and that DeepSeek-V3 delivers the most faithful and stylistically coherent translations. Our work establishes a new paradigm for exploring LLM-based web novel translation and provides public resources to advance future research.

Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in General LLM agent frameworks and benchmarks, one of 16 directions in LLM agents and tool use. Builds on 13 of its 32 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 10 Oct 2025.

Builds on

13 of 32 references.

References · 13

  1. 2021Evaluating Large Language Models Trained on Codecited by 8,053
  2. 2019BERTScore: Evaluating Text Generation with BERTcited by 5,462
  3. 2020BLEURT: Learning Robust Metrics for Text Generationcited by 1,196
  4. 2023Can Large Language Models Be an Alternative to Human Evaluations?cited by 729
  5. 2019COMET: Commonsense Transformers for Automatic Knowledge Graph Constructioncited by 450
  6. 2023Large Language Models Are State-of-the-Art Evaluators of Translation Qualitycited by 416
  7. 2023GEMBA-MQM: Detecting Translation Quality Error Spans with GPT-4cited by 143
  8. 2021BlonDe: An Automatic Evaluation Metric for Document-level Machine Translationcited by 58
  9. 2022DiscoScore: Evaluating Text Generation with BERT and Discourse Coherencecited by 35
  10. 2023Findings of the WMT 2023 Shared Task on Discourse-Level Literary Translation: A Fresh Orb in the Cosmos of LLMscited by 25
  11. 2024Findings of the WMT 2024 Shared Task on Discourse-Level Literary Translationcited by 15
  12. 2024Benchmarking GPT-4 against Human Translators: A Comprehensive Evaluation Across Languages, Domains, and Expertise Levelscited by 9
1 more
  1. 2022A Bilingual Parallel Corpus with Discourse Annotationscited by 3

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 4.

4 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2024(Perhaps) Beyond Human Translation: Harnessing Multi-Agent Collaboration for Translating Ultra-Long Literary Texts
  2. 2025HiMATE: A Hierarchical Multi-Agent Framework for Machine Translation Evaluation
  3. 2026GAIA-v2-LILT: Multilingual Adaptation of Agent Benchmark beyond Translation
  4. 2025MAS-LitEval : Multi-Agent System for Literary Translation Quality Assessment
  5. 2025MAATS: A Multi-Agent Automated Translation System Based on MQM Evaluation
  6. 2024M-MAD: Multidimensional Multi-Agent Debate for Advanced Machine Translation Evaluation
  7. 2025LaoBench: A Large-Scale Multidimensional Lao Benchmark for Large Language Models
  8. 2026OmnilingualGAIA2: Evaluating the Multilingual Gap in Frontier AI Agents