mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Confidence, Not Perplexity: A Better Metric for the Creative Era of LLMs

arXiv 2510.08596 ↗First posted 5 Oct 2025cs.CLcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Reference-free metrics like self-perplexity are strongly biased against creative text generation. We propose the Confidence Score (CS), derived from a model's output probability distribution, as a less biased alternative. Experiments on gpt-4o-mini show that while fluency-based metrics prefer novel responses in 0% of cases on 99 creative prompts, our CS does so 19% of the time, a statistically significant difference (95% CI for difference: [11.1%, 27.3%]). We also show that CS effectively distinguishes between easy, medium, and hard tasks, confirmed by non-overlapping confidence intervals. The Confidence Score thus mitigates the creativity bias of traditional metrics while retaining their core evaluative strengths, offering a more balanced assessment for modern LLMs.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 4 of its 8 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 5 Oct 2025.

Builds on

4 of 8 references.

References · 4

  1. 2019BERTScore: Evaluating Text Generation with BERTcited by 5,462
  2. 2019The Curious Case of Neural Text Degenerationcited by 2,881
  3. 2023G-Eval: NLG Evaluation using GPT-4 with Better Human Alignmentcited by 2,205
  4. 2020SummEval: Re-evaluating Summarization Evaluationcited by 666

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.

1 paper.