Confidence, Not Perplexity: A Better Metric for the Creative Era of LLMs
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Reference-free metrics like self-perplexity are strongly biased against creative text generation. We propose the Confidence Score (CS), derived from a model's output probability distribution, as a less biased alternative. Experiments on gpt-4o-mini show that while fluency-based metrics prefer novel responses in 0% of cases on 99 creative prompts, our CS does so 19% of the time, a statistically significant difference (95% CI for difference: [11.1%, 27.3%]). We also show that CS effectively distinguishes between easy, medium, and hard tasks, confirmed by non-overlapping confidence intervals. The Confidence Score thus mitigates the creativity bias of traditional metrics while retaining their core evaluative strengths, offering a more balanced assessment for modern LLMs.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 4 of its 8 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 5 Oct 2025.
Builds on
4 of 8 references.
References · 4
- 2019BERTScore: Evaluating Text Generation with BERTcited by 5,462
- 2019The Curious Case of Neural Text Degenerationcited by 2,881
- 2023G-Eval: NLG Evaluation using GPT-4 with Better Human Alignmentcited by 2,205
- 2020SummEval: Re-evaluating Summarization Evaluationcited by 666
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.
1 paper.