From Noisy to Native: LLM-driven Graph Restoration for Test-Time Graph Domain Adaptation
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Graph domain adaptation (GDA) has achieved great attention due to its effectiveness in addressing the domain shift between train and test data. A significant bottleneck in existing graph domain adaptation methods is their reliance on source-domain data, which is often unavailable due to privacy or security concerns. This limitation has driven the development of Test-Time Graph Domain Adaptation (TT-GDA), which aims to transfer knowledge without accessing the source examples. Inspired by the generative power of large language models (LLMs), we introduce a novel framework that reframes TT-GDA as a generative graph restoration problem, "restoring the target graph to its pristine, source-domain-like state". There are two key challenges: (1) We need to construct a reasonable graph restoration process and design an effective encoding scheme that an LLM can understand, bridging the modality gap. (2) We need to devise a mechanism to ensure the restored graph acquires the intrinsic features of the source domain, even without access to the source data. To ensure the effectiveness of graph restoration, we propose GRAIL, that restores the target graph into a state that is well-aligned with the source domain. Specifically, we first compress the node representations into compact latent features and then use a graph diffusion process to model the graph restoration process. Then a quantization module encodes the restored features into discrete tokens. Building on this, an LLM is fine-tuned as a generative restorer to transform a "noisy" target graph into a "native" one. To further improve restoration quality, we introduce a reinforcement learning process guided by specialized alignment and confidence rewards. Extensive experiments demonstrate the effectiveness of our approach across various datasets.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 21 of its 45 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 9 Oct 2025.
Builds on
21 of 45 references.
References · 21
- 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 59,932
- 2017Proximal Policy Optimization Algorithmscited by 14,441
- 2017Graph Attention Networkscited by 8,854
- 2017Inductive Representation Learning on Large Graphscited by 6,284
- 2018How Powerful are Graph Neural Networks?cited by 4,355
- 2021Improved Denoising Diffusion Probabilistic Modelscited by 3,736
- 2019Generating Diverse High-Fidelity Images with VQ-VAE-2cited by 1,376
- 2019Graph Neural Networks for Social Recommendationcited by 711
- 2024Sora: A Review on Background, Technology, Limitations, and Opportunities of Large Vision Modelscited by 467
- 2023A Comprehensive Survey on Test-Time Adaptation under Distribution Shiftscited by 353
- 2022Unsupervised Medical Image Translation with Adversarial Diffusion Modelscited by 191
- 2022Handling Distribution Shifts on Graphs: An Invariance Perspectivecited by 163
9 more
- 2017Mind the Class Weight Bias: Weighted Maximum Mean Discrepancy for Unsupervised Domain Adaptationcited by 151
- 2021Generating Diverse Structure for Image Inpainting With Hierarchical VQ-VAEcited by 106
- 2024A Survey of Large Language Models for Graphscited by 71
- 2022Empowering Graph Representation Learning with Test-Time Graph Transformationcited by 66
- 2020Adversarial Deep Network Embedding for Cross-network Node Classificationcited by 44
- 2023TeSLA: Test-Time Self-Learning With Automatic Adversarial Augmentationcited by 28
- 2024Collaborate to Adapt: Source-Free Graph Domain Adaptation via Bi-directional Adaptationcited by 15
- 2024Beyond Generalization: A Survey of Out-Of-Distribution Adaptation on Graphscited by 6
- 2023Semi-supervised Domain Adaptation on Graphs with Contrastive Learning and Minimax Entropycited by 4
Built on by
Not cited yet.