mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Reasoning for Hierarchical Text Classification: The Case of Patents

arXiv 2510.07167 ↗First posted 8 Oct 2025cs.CLcited by 1

On the map: LLM reasoning → Knowledge- and tool-augmented reasoning

Abstract (arXiv)

Hierarchical text classification (HTC) assigns documents to multiple levels of a pre-defined taxonomy. Automated patent subject classification represents one of the hardest HTC scenarios because of domain knowledge difficulty and a huge number of labels. Prior approaches only output a flat label set, which offers little insight into the reason behind predictions. Therefore, we propose Reasoning for Hierarchical Classification (RHC), a novel framework that reformulates HTC as a step-by-step reasoning task to sequentially deduce hierarchical labels. RHC trains large language models (LLMs) in two stages: a cold-start stage that aligns outputs with chain-of-thought (CoT) reasoning format and a reinforcement learning (RL) stage to enhance multi-step reasoning ability. RHC demonstrates four advantages in our experiments. (1) Effectiveness: RHC surpasses previous baselines and outperforms the supervised fine-tuning counterparts by approximately 3% in accuracy and macro F1. (2) Explainability: RHC produces natural-language justifications before prediction to facilitate human inspection. (3) Scalability: RHC scales favorably with model size with larger gains compared to standard fine-tuning. (4) Applicability: Beyond patents, we further demonstrate that RHC achieves state-of-the-art performance on other widely used HTC benchmarks, which highlights its broad applicability.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Knowledge- and tool-augmented reasoning, one of 17 directions in LLM reasoning. Builds on 12 of its 46 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 8 Oct 2025.

Builds on

12 of 46 references.

References · 12

  1. 2023GPT-4 Technical Reportcited by 18,396
  2. 2017Proximal Policy Optimization Algorithmscited by 15,215
  3. 2024The Llama 3 Herd of Modelscited by 14,715
  4. 2019RoBERTa: A Robustly Optimized BERT Pretraining Approachcited by 13,372
  5. 2024DeepSeekMath: Pushing the Limits of Mathematical Reasoning in Open Language Modelscited by 9,379
  6. 2025DeepSeek-R1: Incentivizing Reasoning Capability in LLMs via Reinforcement Learningcited by 6,330
  7. 2019DistilBERT, a distilled version of BERT: smaller, faster, cheaper and lightercited by 4,307
  8. 2024Qwen2 Technical Reportcited by 2,120
  9. 2024HybridFlow: A Flexible and Efficient RLHF Frameworkcited by 2,057
  10. 2024Tulu 3: Pushing Frontiers in Open Language Model Post-Trainingcited by 1,053
  11. 2024Enhancing Code LLMs with Reinforcement Learning in Code Generation: A Surveycited by 83
  12. 2025Enriching Patent Claim Generation with European Patent Datasetcited by 5

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.

1 paper.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2023Large-Scale Text Analysis Using Generative Language Models: A Case Study in Discovering Public Value Expressions in AI Patents
  2. 2026DocHRL: A Hierarchical Reinforcement Learning Framework for Cost-Optimised Document Classification
  3. 2025KG-HTC: Integrating Knowledge Graphs into LLMs for Effective Zero-shot Hierarchical Text Classification
  4. 2024Domain-Hierarchy Adaptation via Chain of Iterative Reasoning for Few-shot Hierarchical Text Classification
  5. 2025Self-Filtered Distillation with LLMs-generated Trust Indicators for Reliable Patent Classification
  6. 2026Constraint-Aware Hierarchical Search for Regulation-Driven Fine-Grained Classification
  7. 2026TextReasoningBench: Does Reasoning Really Improve Text Classification in Large Language Models?
  8. 2025DocThinker: Explainable Multimodal Large Language Models with Rule-based Reinforcement Learning for Document Understanding