SDQM: Synthetic Data Quality Metric for Object Detection Dataset Evaluation
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
The performance of machine learning models depends heavily on training data. The scarcity of large-scale, well-annotated datasets poses significant challenges in creating robust models. To address this, synthetic data generated through simulations and generative models has emerged as a promising solution, enhancing dataset diversity and improving the performance, reliability, and resilience of models. However, evaluating the quality of this generated data requires an effective metric. We introduce the Synthetic Dataset Quality Metric (SDQM) to assess data quality for object detection tasks without requiring model training to converge. This metric enables more efficient generation and selection of synthetic datasets, addressing a key challenge in resource-constrained object detection tasks. In our experiments, SDQM demonstrated a strong correlation with the mean average precision (mAP) scores of YOLO11, a leading object detection model, whereas previous metrics only exhibited moderate or weak correlations. In addition, it provides actionable insights into improving dataset quality, minimizing the need for costly iterative training. This scalable and efficient metric sets a new standard for evaluating synthetic data. The code for SDQM is available at https://github.com/ayushzenith/SDQM
Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 14 of its 30 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 8 Oct 2025.
Builds on
14 of 30 references.
References · 14
- 2021Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervisioncited by 33,744
- 2014Microsoft COCO: Common Objects in Contextcited by 17,608
- 2018The Unreasonable Effectiveness of Deep Features as a Perceptual Metriccited by 11,177
- 2023DINOv2: Learning Robust Visual Features without Supervisioncited by 7,974
- 2023Grounding DINO: Marrying DINO with Grounded Pre-Training for Open-Set Object Detectioncited by 3,332
- 2016Improved Techniques for Training GANscited by 2,970
- 2019Improved Precision and Recall Metric for Assessing Generative Modelscited by 944
- 2020Dataset Cartography: Mapping and Diagnosing Datasets with Training Dynamicscited by 425
- 2021Understanding Dataset Difficulty with V-Usable Informationcited by 291
- 2021How Faithful is your Synthetic Data? Sample-level Metrics for Evaluating and Auditing Generative Modelscited by 196
- 2021Pros and Cons of GAN Evaluation Measures: New Developmentscited by 123
- 2020RarePlanes: Synthetic Data Takes Flightcited by 48
2 more
- 2022MAUVE Scores for Generative Models: Theory and Practicecited by 36
- 2022Dataset of Industrial Metal Objectscited by 8
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 2.
2 papers.