mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

The Effect of Label Noise on the Information Content of Neural Representations

arXiv 2510.06401 ↗First posted 7 Oct 2025cs.LG cs.IT cs.NEcited by 2

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

In supervised classification tasks, models are trained to predict a label for each data point. In real-world datasets, these labels are often noisy due to annotation errors. While the impact of label noise on the performance of deep learning models has been widely studied, its effects on the networks' hidden representations remain poorly understood. We address this gap by systematically comparing hidden representations using the Information Imbalance, a computationally efficient proxy of conditional mutual information. Through this analysis, we observe that the information content of the hidden representations follows a double descent as a function of the number of network parameters, akin to the behavior of the test error. We further demonstrate that in the underparameterized regime, representations learned with noisy labels are more informative than those learned with clean labels, while in the overparameterized regime, these representations are equally informative. Our results indicate that the representations of overparameterized networks are robust to label noise. We also found that the information imbalance between the penultimate and pre-softmax layers decreases with cross-entropy loss in the overparameterized regime. This offers a new perspective on understanding generalization in classification tasks. Extending our analysis to representations learned from random labels, we show that these perform worse than random features. This indicates that training on random labels drives networks much beyond lazy learning, as weights adapt to encode labels information.

Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 17 of its 32 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 7 Oct 2025.

Builds on

17 of 32 references.

References · 17

  1. 2019Similarity of Neural Network Representations Revisitedcited by 1,755
  2. 2016On Large-Batch Training for Deep Learning: Generalization Gap and Sharp Minimacited by 1,352
  3. 2017A Closer Look at Memorization in Deep Networkscited by 942
  4. 2018Reconciling modern machine learning practice and the bias-variance trade-offcited by 927
  5. 2019Deep Double Descent: Where Bigger Models and More Data Hurtcited by 672
  6. 2019The generalization error of random features regression: Precise asymptotics and double descent curvecited by 413
  7. 2019Confident Learning: Estimating Uncertainty in Dataset Labelscited by 413
  8. 2021Pervasive Label Errors in Test Sets Destabilize Machine Learning Benchmarkscited by 395
  9. 2018The jamming transition as a paradigm to understand the loss landscape of deep neural networkscited by 62
  10. 2018Comparing Dynamics: Deep Neural Networks versus Glassy Systemscited by 42
  11. 2021Probing transfer learning with a model of synthetic correlated datasetscited by 25
  12. 2021Ranking the information content of distance measurescited by 22
5 more
  1. 2023A Rainbow in Deep Network Black Boxescited by 18
  2. 2025A note on the physical interpretation of neural PDE'scited by 7
  3. 2023Unraveling the Enigma of Double Descent: An In-depth Analysis through the Lens of Learned Feature Spacecited by 6
  4. 2024Automatic feature selection and weighting in molecular systems using Differentiable Information Imbalancecited by 5
  5. 2025Linear scaling causal discovery from high-dimensional time series by dynamical community detectioncited by 2

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 2.

2 papers.