mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

There is More to Attention: Statistical Filtering Enhances Explanations in Vision Transformers

arXiv 2510.06070 ↗First posted 7 Oct 2025cs.CVcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Explainable AI (XAI) has become increasingly important with the rise of large transformer models, yet many explanation methods designed for CNNs transfer poorly to Vision Transformers (ViTs). Existing ViT explanations often rely on attention weights, which tend to yield noisy maps as they capture token-to-token interactions within each layer.While attribution methods incorporating MLP blocks have been proposed, we argue that attention remains a valuable and interpretable signal when properly filtered. We propose a method that combines attention maps with a statistical filtering, initially proposed for CNNs, to remove noisy or uninformative patterns and produce more faithful explanations. We further extend our approach with a class-specific variant that yields discriminative explanations. Evaluation against popular state-of-the-art methods demonstrates that our approach produces sharper and more interpretable maps. In addition to perturbation-based faithfulness metrics, we incorporate human gaze data to assess alignment with human perception, arguing that human interpretability remains essential for XAI. Across multiple datasets, our approach consistently outperforms or is comparable to the SOTA methods while remaining efficient and human plausible.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 25 of its 34 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 7 Oct 2025.

Builds on

25 of 34 references.

References · 25

  1. 2020An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scalecited by 30,186
  2. 2016Grad-CAM: Visual Explanations from Deep Networks via Gradient-based Localizationcited by 6,733
  3. 2017Grad-CAM++: Improved Visual Explanations for Deep Convolutional Networkscited by 939
  4. 2019Attention is not Explanationcited by 929
  5. 2018RISE: Randomized Input Sampling for Explanation of Black-box Modelscited by 838
  6. 2020Quantifying Attention Flow in Transformerscited by 775
  7. 2021Do Vision Transformers See Like Convolutional Neural Networks?cited by 675
  8. 2019Attention is not not Explanationcited by 636
  9. 2021Efficient Large-Scale Language Model Training on GPU Clusters Using Megatron-LMcited by 632
  10. 2020Transformer Interpretability Beyond Attention Visualizationcited by 627
  11. 2018Towards Robust Interpretability with Self-Explaining Neural Networkscited by 505
  12. 2015Evaluating the visualization of what a Deep Neural Network has learnedcited by 419
13 more
  1. 2019On the (In)fidelity and Sensitivity for Explanationscited by 310
  2. 2019Analyzing the Structure of Attention in a Transformer Language Modelcited by 243
  3. 2016Layer-wise Relevance Propagation for Neural Networks with Local Renormalization Layerscited by 199
  4. 2024AttnLRP: Attention-Aware Layer-Wise Relevance Propagation for Transformerscited by 120
  5. 2022XAI for Transformers: Better Explanations through Conservative Propagationcited by 100
  6. 2020Analyzing the Source and Target Contributions to Predictions in Neural Machine Translationcited by 71
  7. 2017Deep Visual Attention Predictioncited by 70
  8. 2024Explainable AI for Safe and Trustworthy Autonomous Driving: A Systematic Reviewcited by 53
  9. 2024Decoupling Pixel Flipping and Occlusion Strategy for Consistent XAI Benchmarkscited by 28
  10. 2023Opti-CAM: Optimizing saliency maps for interpretabilitycited by 25
  11. 2024Attention Meets Post-hoc Interpretability: A Mathematical Perspectivecited by 11
  12. 2022An Attention Matrix for Every Decision: Faithfulness-based Arbitration Among Multiple Attention-Based Interpretations of Transformers in Text Classificationcited by 6
  13. 2023On the stability, correctness and plausibility of visual explanation methods based on feature importancecited by 2

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2025: 1.

1 paper.