Beyond Spectral Peaks: Interpreting the Cues Behind Synthetic Image Detection
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Over the years, the forensics community has proposed several deep learning-based detectors to mitigate the risks of generative AI. Recently, frequency-domain artifacts (particularly periodic peaks in the magnitude spectrum), have received significant attention, as they have been often considered a strong indicator of synthetic image generation. However, state-of-the-art detectors are typically used as black-boxes, and it still remains unclear whether they truly rely on these peaks. This limits their interpretability and trust. In this work, we conduct a systematic study to address this question. We propose a strategy to remove spectral peaks from images and analyze the impact of this operation on several detectors. In addition, we introduce a simple linear detector that relies exclusively on frequency peaks, providing a fully interpretable baseline free from the confounding influence of deep learning. Our findings reveal that most detectors are not fundamentally dependent on spectral peaks, challenging a widespread assumption in the field and paving the way for more transparent and reliable forensic tools.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 18 of its 28 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 7 Oct 2025.
Builds on
18 of 28 references.
References · 18
- 2023SDXL: Improving Latent Diffusion Models for High-Resolution Image Synthesiscited by 4,356
- 2016Beyond a Gaussian Denoiser: Residual Learning of Deep CNN for Image Denoisingcited by 1,358
- 2020Leveraging Frequency Analysis for Deep Fake Image Recognitioncited by 504
- 2019Detecting and Simulating Artifacts in GAN Fake Imagescited by 293
- 2022On the detection of synthetic images generated by diffusion modelscited by 283
- 2020Watch your Up-Convolution: CNN Based Generative Deep Neural Networks are Failing to Reproduce Spectral Distributionscited by 280
- 2023Pixel-Aware Stable Diffusion for Realistic Image Super-resolution and Personalized Stylizationcited by 254
- 2022DE-FAKE: Detection and Attribution of Fake Images Generated by Text-to-Image Generation Modelscited by 168
- 2023Raising the Bar of AI-generated Image Detection with CLIPcited by 164
- 2019Fourier Spectrum Discrepancies in Deep Network Generated Imagescited by 139
- 2023Intriguing properties of synthetic images: from generative adversarial networks to diffusion modelscited by 123
- 2024Leveraging Representations from Intermediate Encoder-blocks for Synthetic Image Detectioncited by 89
6 more
- 2024A Bias-Free Training Paradigm for More General AI-generated Image Detectioncited by 67
- 2024Contrasting Deepfakes Diffusion via Contrastive Learning and Global-Local Similaritiescited by 27
- 2025WILD: a new in-the-Wild Image Linkage Dataset for synthetic image attributioncited by 9
- 2024When Synthetic Traces Hide Real Content: Analysis of Stable Diffusion Image Launderingcited by 7
- 2024Deepfake Detection without Deepfakes: Generalization via Synthetic Frequency Patterns Injectioncited by 5
- 2024Is JPEG AI going to change image forensics?cited by 5
Built on by
Not cited yet.