mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

MADIAVE: Multi-Agent Debate for Implicit Attribute Value Extraction

arXiv 2510.05611 ↗First posted 7 Oct 2025cs.CL cs.AIcited by 2

On the map: LLM agents and tool use → Social simulation and multi-agent debate

Abstract (arXiv)

Implicit Attribute Value Extraction (AVE) is essential for accurately representing products in e-commerce, as it infers latent attributes from multimodal data. Despite advances in multimodal large language models (MLLMs), implicit AVE remains challenging due to the complexity of multidimensional data and gaps in vision-text understanding. In this work, we introduce MADIAVE, a multi-agent debate framework that employs multiple MLLM agents to iteratively refine inferences. Through a series of debate rounds, agents verify and update each other's responses, thereby improving inference performance and robustness. Experiments on the ImplicitAVE dataset demonstrate that even a few rounds of debate significantly boost accuracy, especially for attributes with initially low performance. We systematically evaluate various debate configurations, including identical or different MLLM agents, and analyze how debate rounds affect convergence dynamics. Our findings highlight the potential of multi-agent debate strategies to address the limitations of single-agent approaches and offer a scalable solution for implicit AVE in multimodal e-commerce.

Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Social simulation and multi-agent debate, one of 16 directions in LLM agents and tool use. Builds on 27 of its 50 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 7 Oct 2025.

Builds on

27 of 50 references.

Closest ancestors · 1

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2024Systematic Biases in LLM Simulations of Debates6 Feb

Other references · 26

  1. 2022Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackcited by 15,971
  2. 2025Qwen2.5-VL Technical Reportcited by 5,587
  3. 2023Improving Factuality and Reasoning in Language Models through Multiagent Debatecited by 1,784
  4. 2023ChatEval: Towards Better LLM-based Evaluators through Multi-Agent Debatecited by 742
  5. 2024Debating with More Persuasive LLMs Leads to More Truthful Answerscited by 266
  6. 2023BLIVA: A Simple Multimodal LLM for Better Handling of Text-Rich Visual Questionscited by 125
  7. 2018OpenTag: Open Attribute Value Extraction from Product Profiles [Deep Learning, Active Learning, Named Entity Recognition]cited by 63
  8. 2021MAVE: A Product Dataset for Multi-source Attribute Value Extractioncited by 53
  9. 2025From Web Search towards Agentic Deep Research: Incentivizing Search with Reasoning Agentscited by 51
  10. 2025Towards Agentic RAG with Deep Reasoning: A Survey of RAG-Reasoning Systems in LLMscited by 42
  11. 2021AdaTag: Multi-Attribute Value Extraction from Product Profiles with Adaptive Decodingcited by 32
  12. 2025LLM-Based Human-Agent Collaboration and Interaction Systems: A Surveycited by 29
14 more
  1. 2025Multi-Agent Autonomous Driving Systems with Large Language Models: A Survey of Recent Advancescited by 21
  2. 2023ExtractGPT: Exploring the Potential of Large Language Models for Product Attribute Value Extractioncited by 20
  3. 2021PAM: Understanding Product Images in Cross Product Category Attribute Extractioncited by 18
  4. 2024ImplicitAVE: An Open-Source Dataset and Multimodal LLMs Benchmark for Implicit Attribute Value Extractioncited by 17
  5. 2024EIVEN: Efficient Implicit Attribute Value Extraction using Multimodal LLMcited by 12
  6. 2025PSG-Agent: Personality-Aware Safety Guardrail for LLM-based Agentscited by 12
  7. 2025A Call for Collaborative Intelligence: Why Human-Agent Systems Should Precede AI Autonomycited by 9
  8. 2024Multi-Label Zero-Shot Product Attribute-Value Extractioncited by 7
  9. 2024An Empirical Comparison of Generative Approaches for Product Attribute-Value Identificationcited by 7
  10. 2025TACLR: A Scalable and Efficient Retrieval-based Method for Industrial Product Attribute Value Identificationcited by 6
  11. 2024Identifying Factual Inconsistencies in Summaries: Grounding LLM Inference via Task Taxonomycited by 5
  12. 2024EAVE: Efficient Product Attribute Value Extraction via Lightweight Sparse-layer Interactioncited by 4
  13. 2024Exploring Large Language Models for Product Attribute Value Identificationcited by 3
  14. 2025Visual Zero-Shot E-Commerce Product Attribute Value Extractioncited by 3

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 1; 2026: 1.

2 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2026Tool-MAD: A Multi-Agent Debate Framework for Fact Verification with Diverse Tool Augmentation and Adaptive Retrieval
  2. 2025S2-MAD: Breaking the Token Barrier to Enhance Multi-Agent Debate Efficiency
  3. 2026ARMOR-MAD: Adaptive Routing for Heterogeneous Multi-Agent Debate in Large Language Model Reasoning
  4. 2026AutoPKG: An Automated Framework for Dynamic E-commerce Product-Attribute Knowledge Graph Construction
  5. 2025Debate or Vote: Which Yields Better Decisions in Multi-Agent Large Language Models?
  6. 2025Stop Overvaluing Multi-Agent Debate -- We Must Rethink Evaluation and Embrace Model Heterogeneity
  7. 2026M3MAD-Bench: Multi-Dimensional Evaluation of Multi-Agent Debate Across Domains and Modalities
  8. 2025iMAD: Intelligent Multi-Agent Debate for Efficient and Accurate LLM Inference