mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Mission Impossible: Feedback-Guided Dynamic Interactive Planning for Improving Reasoning on LLMs

arXiv 2510.05577 ↗First posted 7 Oct 2025cs.CL cs.AIcited by 1

On the map: LLM reasoning → Reasoning for agents, planning and code

Abstract (arXiv)

Recent advancements in language agents have led to significant improvements in multi-hop reasoning tasks. However, existing approaches often struggle with handling open-domain problems, which require massive information retrieval due to their reliance on a fixed sequence of actions. To address this, we propose Feedback-Guided Dynamic Interactive Planning (FGDIP), a novel framework tailored to enhance reasoning in LLMs by utilizing dynamic and adaptive strategies for information exploration in open-domain multi-hop reasoning tasks. Our approach begins by identifying key entities relevant to the problem, which serve as the initial nodes in the reasoning process. From these initial nodes, we then generate reasoning child nodes with the process being refined through a combination of historical error analysis and real-time feedback, which allows the framework to dynamically adjust and optimize its reasoning strategies. By integrating depth-first search with an innovative node generation technique, our framework adapts based on both prior error paths and concurrently generated nodes at the same hierarchical level. This dynamic strategy effectively expands the search space while ensuring the reasoning process systematically converges toward accurate solutions. Experimental results show that FGDIP achieved up to 54.47% F1 score on the HotpotQA dataset and 70.05% on the StrategyQA dataset, surpassing the best baseline by 5.03% and 7.25% respectively, highlighting its versatility and potential to enhance language agents in multi-hop reasoning tasks.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Reasoning for agents, planning and code, one of 17 directions in LLM reasoning. Builds on 20 of its 24 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 7 Oct 2025.

Builds on

20 of 24 references.

References · 20

  1. 2023GPT-4 Technical Reportcited by 18,132
  2. 2022Chain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language Modelscited by 12,302
  3. 2022ReAct: Synergizing Reasoning and Acting in Language Modelscited by 8,355
  4. 2022Self-Consistency Improves Chain of Thought Reasoning in Language Modelscited by 5,601
  5. 2023Reflexion: Language Agents with Verbal Reinforcement Learningcited by 4,064
  6. 2018HotpotQA: A Dataset for Diverse, Explainable Multi-hop Question Answeringcited by 3,686
  7. 2023Self-Refine: Iterative Refinement with Self-Feedbackcited by 3,317
  8. 2023Tree of Thoughts: Deliberate Problem Solving with Large Language Modelscited by 3,155
  9. 2023ToolLLM: Facilitating Large Language Models to Master 16000+ Real-world APIscited by 1,880
  10. 2023MetaGPT: Meta Programming for A Multi-Agent Collaborative Frameworkcited by 1,761
  11. 2023The Rise and Potential of Large Language Model Based Agents: A Surveycited by 1,422
  12. 2023Gemini: A Family of Highly Capable Multimodal Modelscited by 810
8 more
  1. 2023AgentVerse: Facilitating Multi-Agent Collaboration and Exploring Emergent Behaviorscited by 580
  2. 2023Chameleon: Plug-and-Play Compositional Reasoning with Large Language Modelscited by 352
  3. 2022Reasoning with Language Model Prompting: A Surveycited by 251
  4. 2023FireAct: Toward Language Agent Fine-tuningcited by 247
  5. 2024AutoAct: Automatic Agent Learning from Scratch for QA via Self-Planningcited by 81
  6. 2024KnowAgent: Knowledge-Augmented Planning for LLM-Based Agentscited by 61
  7. 2024Towards Uncertainty-Aware Language Agentcited by 29
  8. 2024Dr3: Ask Large Language Models Not to Give Off-Topic Answers in Open Domain Multi-Hop Question Answeringcited by 4

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.

1 paper.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2025Policy Guided Tree Search for Enhanced LLM Reasoning
  2. 2025Learning When to Plan: Efficiently Allocating Test-Time Compute for LLM Agents
  3. 2025Adaptive Test-Time Reasoning via Reward-Guided Dual-Phase Search
  4. 2024Query-Efficient Planning with Language Models
  5. 2026AdaPlanBench: Evaluating Adaptive Planning in Large Language Model Agents under World and User Constraints
  6. 2023Language Agent Tree Search Unifies Reasoning Acting and Planning in Language Models
  7. 2023On the Planning Abilities of Large Language Models : A Critical Investigation
  8. 2025Large Language Models for Planning: A Comprehensive and Systematic Survey