mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Computing frustration and near-monotonicity in deep neural networks

arXiv 2510.05286 ↗First posted 6 Oct 2025cs.LG cond-mat.dis-nn stat.MLcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

For the signed graph associated to a deep neural network, one can compute the frustration level, i.e., test how close or distant the graph is to structural balance. For all the pretrained deep convolutional neural networks we consider, we find that the frustration is always less than expected from null models. From a statistical physics point of view, and in particular in reference to an Ising spin glass model, the reduced frustration indicates that the amount of disorder encoded in the network is less than in the null models. From a functional point of view, low frustration (i.e., proximity to structural balance) means that the function representing the network behaves near-monotonically, i.e., more similarly to a monotone function than in the null models. Evidence of near-monotonic behavior along the partial order determined by frustration is observed for all networks we consider. This confirms that the class of deep convolutional neural networks tends to have a more ordered behavior than expected from null models, and suggests a novel form of implicit regularization.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 23 of its 45 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 6 Oct 2025.

Builds on

23 of 45 references.

References · 23

  1. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 52,096
  2. 2014Going Deeper with Convolutionscited by 4,241
  3. 2017ShuffleNet: An Extremely Efficient Convolutional Neural Network for Mobile Devicescited by 1,200
  4. 2016SqueezeNet: AlexNet-level accuracy with 50x fewer parameters and <0.5MB model sizecited by 1,060
  5. 2013Exact solutions to the nonlinear dynamics of learning in deep linear neural networkscited by 763
  6. 2020Prevalence of Neural Collapse during the terminal phase of deep learning trainingcited by 719
  7. 2017The Implicit Bias of Gradient Descent on Separable Datacited by 655
  8. 2017Exploring Generalization in Deep Learningcited by 600
  9. 2018On the Optimization of Deep Networks: Implicit Acceleration by Overparameterizationcited by 284
  10. 2014The Loss Surfaces of Multilayer Networkscited by 280
  11. 2016Deep Learning without Poor Local Minimacited by 234
  12. 2020Towards Resolving the Implicit Bias of Gradient Descent for Matrix Factorization: Greedy Low-Rank Learningcited by 150
11 more
  1. 2022On the Implicit Bias in Deep-Learning Algorithmscited by 86
  2. 2020Certified Monotonic Neural Networkscited by 51
  3. 2022Constrained Monotonic Neural Networkscited by 32
  4. 2017Global optimality conditions for deep neural networkscited by 31
  5. 2021The loss landscape of deep linear neural networks: a second-order analysiscited by 24
  6. 2018Monotonic classification: an overview on algorithms, performance measures and data setscited by 18
  7. 2024The Implicit Bias of Gradient Descent on Separable Multiclass Datacited by 11
  8. 2018A Geometric Approach of Gradient Descent Algorithms in Linear Neural Networkscited by 8
  9. 2020Testing Monotonicity of Machine Learning Modelscited by 8
  10. 2015Measuring Partial Balance in Signed Networkscited by 4
  11. 2024Lecture Notes on Linear Neural Networks: A Tale of Optimization and Generalization in Deep Learningcited by 1

Built on by

Not cited yet.