LMM-Incentive: Large Multimodal Model-based Incentive Design for User-Generated Content in Web 3.0
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Web 3.0 represents the next generation of the Internet, which is widely recognized as a decentralized ecosystem that focuses on value expression and data ownership. By leveraging blockchain and artificial intelligence technologies, Web 3.0 offers unprecedented opportunities for users to create, own, and monetize their content, thereby enabling User-Generated Content (UGC) to an entirely new level. However, some self-interested users may exploit the limitations of content curation mechanisms and generate low-quality content with less effort, obtaining platform rewards under information asymmetry. Such behavior can undermine Web 3.0 performance. To this end, we propose textitLMM-Incentive, a novel Large Multimodal Model (LMM)-based incentive mechanism for UGC in Web 3.0. Specifically, we propose an LMM-based contract-theoretic model to motivate users to generate high-quality UGC, thereby mitigating the adverse selection problem from information asymmetry. To alleviate potential moral hazards after contract selection, we leverage LMM agents to evaluate UGC quality, which is the primary component of the contract, utilizing prompt engineering techniques to improve the evaluation performance of LMM agents. Recognizing that traditional contract design methods cannot effectively adapt to the dynamic environment of Web 3.0, we develop an improved Mixture of Experts (MoE)-based Proximal Policy Optimization (PPO) algorithm for optimal contract design. Simulation results demonstrate the superiority of the proposed MoE-based PPO algorithm over representative benchmarks in the context of contract design. Finally, we deploy the designed contract within an Ethereum smart contract framework, further validating the effectiveness of the proposed scheme.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 17 of its 40 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 6 Oct 2025.
Builds on
17 of 40 references.
References · 17
- 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,199
- 2017Proximal Policy Optimization Algorithmscited by 14,441
- 2018Soft Actor-Critic: Off-Policy Maximum Entropy Deep Reinforcement Learning with a Stochastic Actorcited by 4,635
- 2023Enhancing Deep Reinforcement Learning: A Tutorial on Generative Diffusion Models in Network Optimizationcited by 56
- 2020Contracts under Moral Hazard and Adverse Selectioncited by 21
- 2023Blockchain-empowered Federated Learning for Healthcare Metaverses: User-centric Incentive Mechanism with Optimal Data Freshnesscited by 15
- 2024Diffusion Model-based Incentive Mechanism with Prospect Theory for Edge AIGC Services in 6G IoTcited by 9
- 2023Reinforcement Learning With LLMs Interaction For Distributed Diffusion Model Servicescited by 7
- 2023Artificial Intelligence for Web 3.0: A Comprehensive Surveycited by 4
- 2024ProSecutor: Protecting Mobile AIGC Services on Two-Layer Blockchain via Reputation and Contract Theoretic Approachescited by 3
- 2025Diffusion-based Dynamic Contract for Federated AI Agent Construction in Mobile Metaversescited by 3
- 2024Enhancing Trust and Security in the Vehicular Metaverse: A Reputation-Based Mechanism for Participants with Moral Hazardcited by 2
5 more
- 2024Transparent Tagging for Strategic Social Nudges on User-Generated Misinformationcited by 2
- 2024Defending Against Network Attacks for Secure AI Agent Migration in Vehicular Metaversescited by 2
- 2024Learning-based Big Data Sharing Incentive in Mobile AIGC Networkscited by 1
- 2024Vision Language Model-Empowered Contract Theory for AIGC Task Allocation in Teleoperationcited by 1
- 2025Learning to Incentivize: LLM-Empowered Contract for AIGC Offloading in Teleoperationcited by 1
Built on by
Not cited yet.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2025Towards Transparent and Incentive-Compatible Collaboration in Decentralized LLM Multi-Agent Systems: A Blockchain-Driven Approach
- 2026CAVEAT: Towards Robust Computer-Use Agents in Incentive-Misaligned Environments
- 2026Mechanism Design for Quality-Preserving LLM Advertising
- 2026Contracting for LLM Delegation: Moral Hazard in Technology and Effort Choice ↗
- 2025BetaWeb: Towards a Blockchain-enabled Trustworthy Agentic Web
- 2026DART: A DAG-Based Reputation and Incentive Framework via Blockchain-Enabled Governance for Trustworthy LLM Multi-Agent Collaboration
- 2026Strategic Exploitation in LLM Agent Markets: A Simulation Framework for E-Commerce Trust
- 2026How Much Can We Trust LLM Search Agents? Measuring Endorsement Vulnerability to Web Content Manipulation