Counterfactual Credit Guided Bayesian Optimization
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Bayesian optimization has emerged as a prominent methodology for optimizing expensive black-box functions by leveraging Gaussian process surrogates, which focus on capturing the global characteristics of the objective function. However, in numerous practical scenarios, the primary objective is not to construct an exhaustive global surrogate, but rather to quickly pinpoint the global optimum. Due to the aleatoric nature of the sequential optimization problem and its dependence on the quality of the surrogate model and the initial design, it is restrictive to assume that all observed samples contribute equally to the discovery of the optimum in this context. In this paper, we introduce Counterfactual Credit Guided Bayesian Optimization (CCGBO), a novel framework that explicitly quantifies the contribution of individual historical observations through counterfactual credit. By incorporating counterfactual credit into the acquisition function, our approach can selectively allocate resources in areas where optimal solutions are most likely to occur. We prove that CCGBO retains sublinear regret. Empirical evaluations on various synthetic and real-world benchmarks demonstrate that CCGBO consistently reduces simple regret and accelerates convergence to the global optimum.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 24 of its 42 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 6 Oct 2025.
Builds on
24 of 42 references.
References · 24
- 2017Understanding Black-box Predictions via Influence Functionscited by 1,741
- 2018A Tutorial on Bayesian Optimizationcited by 744
- 2019Scalable Global Optimization via Local Bayesian Optimizationcited by 374
- 2023Unexpected Improvements to Expected Improvement for Bayesian Optimizationcited by 149
- 2015High Dimensional Bayesian Optimisation and Bandits via Additive Modelscited by 139
- 2018Maximizing acquisition functions for Bayesian optimizationcited by 114
- 2024Vanilla Bayesian Optimization Performs Great in High Dimensionscited by 92
- 2019Hindsight Credit Assignmentcited by 79
- 2022Recent Advances in Bayesian Optimizationcited by 76
- 2022πBO: Augmenting Acquisition Functions with User Beliefs for Bayesian Optimizationcited by 70
- 2020Counterfactual Credit Assignment in Model-Free Reinforcement Learningcited by 64
- 2017Bayesian Optimization with Gradientscited by 59
12 more
- 2022Joint Entropy Search for Maximally-Informed Bayesian Optimizationcited by 55
- 2016Time-Varying Gaussian Process Bandit Optimizationcited by 50
- 2021Weighted Gaussian Process Bandits for Non-stationary Environmentscited by 30
- 2017Practical Bayesian optimization in the presence of outlierscited by 25
- 2020Incorporating Expert Prior in Bayesian Optimisation via Space Warpingcited by 23
- 2023A General Framework for User-Guided Bayesian Optimizationcited by 22
- 2021Safe Learning and Optimization Techniques: Towards a Survey of the State of the Artcited by 16
- 2023Would I have gotten that reward? Long-term credit assignment by counterfactual contribution analysiscited by 13
- 2017Practical Bayesian Optimization for Model Fitting with Bayesian Adaptive Direct Searchcited by 11
- 2021JUMBO: Scalable Multi-task Bayesian Optimization using Offline Datacited by 8
- 2022Bayesian Optimization Augmented with Actively Elicited Expert Knowledgecited by 6
- 2025Convergence Rates of Constrained Expected Improvementcited by 2
Built on by
Not cited yet.