mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Internal states before wait modulate reasoning patterns

arXiv 2510.04128 ↗First posted 5 Oct 2025cs.AI cs.CLcited by 6

On the map: LLM reasoning → Test-time compute and efficient thinking

Abstract (arXiv)

Prior work has shown that a significant driver of performance in reasoning models is their ability to reason and self-correct. A distinctive marker in these reasoning traces is the token wait, which often signals reasoning behavior such as backtracking. Despite being such a complex behavior, little is understood of exactly why models do or do not decide to reason in this particular manner, which limits our understanding of what makes a reasoning model so effective. In this work, we address the question whether model's latents preceding wait tokens contain relevant information for modulating the subsequent reasoning process. We train crosscoders at multiple layers of DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Llama-8B and its base version, and introduce a latent attribution technique in the crosscoder setting. We locate a small set of features relevant for promoting/suppressing wait tokens' probabilities. Finally, through a targeted series of experiments analyzing max activating examples and causal interventions, we show that many of our identified features indeed are relevant for the reasoning process and give rise to different types of reasoning patterns such as restarting from the beginning, recalling prior knowledge, expressing uncertainty, and double-checking.

Key facts. Cited by 6 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Test-time compute and efficient thinking, one of 17 directions in LLM reasoning. Builds on 7 of its 15 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 5 Oct 2025.

Builds on

7 of 15 references.

Closest ancestors · 3

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2025Understanding Reasoning in Thinking Language Models via Steering Vectors22 Jun
  2. 2025The Geometry of Self-Verification in a Task-Specific Reasoning Model19 Apr
  3. 2025Reasoning Models Know When They're Right: Probing Hidden States for Self-Verification7 Apr

Other references · 4

  1. 2024Sparse Feature Circuits: Discovering and Editing Interpretable Causal Graphs in Language Modelscited by 412
  2. 2024Patchscopes: A Unifying Framework for Inspecting Hidden Representations of Language Modelscited by 225
  3. 2024AtP*: An efficient and scalable method for localizing LLM behaviour to componentscited by 100
  4. 2025Towards Understanding Distilled Reasoning Models: A Representational Approachcited by 26

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 1; 2026: 5.

6 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2025Reasoning-Finetuning Repurposes Latent Representations in Base Models
  2. 2026Final Checkpoints Are Not Enough: Analyzing Latent Reasoning Faithfulness Along Training Trajectories
  3. 2025Tracing the Traces: Latent Temporal Signals for Efficient and Accurate Reasoning
  4. 2025Do Latent Tokens Think? A Causal and Adversarial Analysis of Chain-of-Continuous-Thought
  5. 2025Wait, We Don't Need to "Wait"! Removing Thinking Tokens Improves Reasoning Efficiency
  6. 2026LatentHarness: Learning Latent Actions for Memory and Reasoning via Counterfactual Policy Distillation
  7. 2026What's Holding Back Latent Visual Reasoning?
  8. 2026Unlocking the Working Memory of Large Language Models for Latent Reasoning