You Have Been LaTeXpOsEd: A Systematic Analysis of Information Leakage in Preprint Archives Using Large Language Models
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
The widespread use of preprint repositories such as arXiv has accelerated the communication of scientific results but also introduced overlooked security risks. Beyond PDFs, these platforms provide unrestricted access to original source materials, including LaTeX sources, auxiliary code, figures, and embedded comments. In the absence of sanitization, submissions may disclose sensitive information that adversaries can harvest using open-source intelligence. In this work, we present the first large-scale security audit of preprint archives, analyzing more than 1.2 TB of source data from 100,000 arXiv submissions. We introduce LaTeXpOsEd, a four-stage framework that integrates pattern matching, logical filtering, traditional harvesting techniques, and large language models (LLMs) to uncover hidden disclosures within non-referenced files and LaTeX comments. To evaluate LLMs' secret-detection capabilities, we introduce LLMSec-DB, a benchmark on which we tested 25 state-of-the-art models. Our analysis uncovered thousands of PII leaks, GPS-tagged EXIF files, publicly available Google Drive and Dropbox folders, editable private SharePoint links, exposed GitHub and Google credentials, and cloud API keys. We also uncovered confidential author communications, internal disagreements, and conference submission credentials, exposing information that poses serious reputational risks to both researchers and institutions. We urge the research community and repository operators to take immediate action to close these hidden security gaps. To support open science, we release all scripts and methods from this study but withhold sensitive findings that could be misused, in line with ethical principles. The source code and related material are available at the project website https://github.com/LaTeXpOsEd
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 7 of its 38 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 4 Oct 2025.
Builds on
7 of 38 references.
References · 7
- 2023The strain on scientific publishingcited by 17
- 2025CASTLE: Benchmarking Dataset for Static Code Analyzers and LLMs towards CWE Detectioncited by 10
- 2023A Comparative Study of Software Secrets Reporting by Secret Detection Toolscited by 5
- 2025Secret Breach Detection in Source Code with Large Language Modelscited by 3
- 2025Hidden Division of Labor in Scientific Teams Revealed Through 1.6 Million LaTeX Filescited by 2
- 2025Detecting Hard-Coded Credentials in Software Repositories via LLMscited by 2
- 2015The control over personal data: True remedy or fairy tale ?cited by 1
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.
1 paper.