A Qualitative Comparative Evaluation of Cognitive and Generative Theories
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Evaluation is a critical activity associated with any theory. Yet this has proven to be an exceptionally challenging activity for theories based on cognitive architectures. For an overlapping set of reasons, evaluation can also be challenging for theories based on generative neural architectures. This dual challenge is approached here by leveraging a broad perspective on theory evaluation to yield a wide-ranging, albeit qualitative, comparison of whole-mind-oriented cognitive and generative architectures and the full systems that are based on these architectures.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 13 of its 57 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 3 Oct 2025.
Builds on
13 of 57 references.
References · 13
- 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 60,361
- 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,419
- 2024The Llama 3 Herd of Modelscited by 14,715
- 2022Chain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language Modelscited by 12,459
- 2023Generative Agents: Interactive Simulacra of Human Behaviorcited by 3,568
- 2019Fine-Tuning Language Models from Human Preferencescited by 2,150
- 2023Cognitive Architectures for Language Agentscited by 429
- 2023Explainability for Large Language Models: A Surveycited by 333
- 2018An Introduction to Deep Reinforcement Learningcited by 206
- 2023Efficient Large Language Models: A Surveycited by 186
- 2024Centaur: a foundation model of human cognitioncited by 36
- 2023Synergistic Integration of Large Language Models and Cognitive Architectures for Robust AI: An Exploratory Analysiscited by 11
1 more
- 2013The SP theory of intelligence: an overviewcited by 1
Built on by
Not cited yet.