Chaining 2-FWL GNNs for Combinatorial Graph Alignment
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
For the combinatorial graph alignment problem (GAP) -- finding the node correspondence that maximizes the number of common edges (nce) between two unlabeled graphs -- properly initialized FAQ remains a strong classical baseline, while existing GNN approaches struggle in the purely structural setting. We introduce a chaining procedure: a sequence of Folklore-type (2-FWL) GNNs in which each network is trained with cross-entropy after decoding the previous network's similarity matrix and ranking nodes by their current alignment quality. This non-differentiable ranking step injects discrete combinatorial feedback at every link; at inference, we iterate the final network and keep the candidate with highest observed nce. On sparse Erdos-Renyi graphs at noise level 0.25, chained FGNNs with FAQ post-processing reach 85% accuracy versus 13% for FAQ initialized from the convex relaxation, and essentially 0% for prior GNN methods. On correlated regular graphs, where MPNNs with constant features produce identical node embeddings (1-WL fails to refine) and FAQ's convex initialization is degenerate, chaining is the only method we know that recovers a non-trivial alignment. On three real-world benchmarks (yeast PPI, coauthorship, and road networks), we show that recent comparisons underestimate FAQ by initializing it from a uniform doubly stochastic matrix; once FAQ is initialized from the convex relaxation it already surpasses prior reported numbers, and dataset-specific chained FGNNs further improve on this strengthened baseline.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 26 of its 55 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 3 Oct 2025.
Builds on
26 of 55 references.
References · 26
- 2018How Powerful are Graph Neural Networks?cited by 4,355
- 2019Provably Powerful Graph Networkscited by 385
- 2019Graph Matching Networks for Learning the Similarity of Graph Structured Objectscited by 202
- 2020GraphNorm: A Principled Approach to Accelerating Graph Neural Network Trainingcited by 116
- 2019Scalable Gromov-Wasserstein Learning for Graph Partitioning and Matchingcited by 102
- 2020Expressive Power of Invariant and Equivariant Graph Neural Networkscited by 100
- 2020Deep Graph Matching Consensuscited by 85
- 2019Neural Graph Matching Network: Learning Lawler's Quadratic Assignment Problem with Extension to Hypergraph and Multiple-graph Matchingcited by 83
- 2020Deep Graph Matching via Blackbox Differentiation of Combinatorial Solverscited by 81
- 2018Efficient random graph matching via degree profilescited by 48
- 2016Improved Achievability and Converse Bounds for ErdHos-R'enyi Graph Matchingcited by 30
- 2020Multi-level Graph Convolutional Networks for Cross-platform Anchor Link Predictioncited by 30
14 more
- 2014Graph Matching: Relax at Your Own Riskcited by 27
- 2019Spectral Graph Matching and Regularized Quadratic Relaxations II: ErdHos-R'enyi Graphs and Universalitycited by 27
- 2022Random graph matching at Otter's threshold via counting chandelierscited by 25
- 2021Impossibility of Partial Recovery in the Graph Alignment Problemcited by 21
- 2021Deep Graph Matching under Quadratic Constraintcited by 18
- 2022Matching recovery threshold for correlated random graphscited by 16
- 2021Correlation detection in trees for planted graph alignmentcited by 14
- 2022Statistical limits of correlation detection in treescited by 12
- 2023A polynomial-time iterative algorithm for random graph matching with non-vanishing correlationcited by 8
- 2013Robust Multimodal Graph Matching: Sparse Coding Meets Graph Matchingcited by 7
- 2018(Probably) Concave Graph Matchingcited by 7
- 2022SeedGNN: Graph Neural Networks for Supervised Seeded Graph Matchingcited by 3
- 2024Faster algorithms for the alignment of sparse correlated Erd"os-R'enyi random graphscited by 3
- 2025Graph Alignment for Benchmarking Graph Neural Networks and Learning Positional Encodingscited by 1
Built on by
Not cited yet.