mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

ELMF4EggQ: Ensemble Learning with Multimodal Feature Fusion for Non-Destructive Egg Quality Assessment

arXiv 2510.02876 ↗First posted 3 Oct 2025cs.CV cs.LGcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Accurate, non-destructive assessment of egg quality is critical for ensuring food safety, maintaining product standards, and operational efficiency in commercial poultry production. This paper introduces ELMF4EggQ, an ensemble learning framework that employs multimodal feature fusion to classify egg grade and freshness using only external attributes - image, shape, and weight. A novel, publicly available dataset of 186 brown-shelled eggs was constructed, with egg grade and freshness levels determined through laboratory-based expert assessments involving internal quality measurements, such as yolk index and Haugh unit. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study to apply machine learning methods for internal egg quality assessment using only external, non-invasive features, and the first to release a corresponding labeled dataset. The proposed framework integrates deep features extracted from external egg images with structural characteristics such as egg shape and weight, enabling a comprehensive representation of each egg. Image feature extraction is performed using top-performing pre-trained CNN models (ResNet152, DenseNet169, and ResNet152V2), followed by PCA-based dimensionality reduction, SMOTE augmentation, and classification using multiple machine learning algorithms. An ensemble voting mechanism combines predictions from the best-performing classifiers to enhance overall accuracy. Experimental results demonstrate that the multimodal approach significantly outperforms image-only and tabular (shape and weight) only baselines, with the multimodal ensemble approach achieving 86.57% accuracy in grade classification and 70.83% in freshness prediction. All code and data are publicly available at https://github.com/Kenshin-Keeps/Egg_Quality_Prediction_ELMF4EggQ, promoting transparency, reproducibility, and further research in this domain.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 15 of its 86 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 3 Oct 2025.

Builds on

15 of 86 references.

References · 15

  1. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,809
  2. 2020An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scalecited by 29,915
  3. 2016Densely Connected Convolutional Networkscited by 6,691
  4. 2019EfficientNet: Rethinking Model Scaling for Convolutional Neural Networkscited by 6,415
  5. 2015Rethinking the Inception Architecture for Computer Visioncited by 5,451
  6. 2018MobileNetV2: Inverted Residuals and Linear Bottleneckscited by 4,773
  7. 2016Xception: Deep Learning with Depthwise Separable Convolutionscited by 2,320
  8. 2016Inception-v4, Inception-ResNet and the Impact of Residual Connections on Learningcited by 1,509
  9. 2017Zero-Shot Learning -- The Good, the Bad and the Uglycited by 254
  10. 2022Learning from Few Examples: A Summary of Approaches to Few-Shot Learningcited by 86
  11. 2023Best of Both Worlds: Multimodal Contrastive Learning with Tabular and Imaging Datacited by 68
  12. 2021Few-shot Image Classification: Just Use a Library of Pre-trained Feature Extractors and a Simple Classifiercited by 32
3 more
  1. 2024Development of Skip Connection in Deep Neural Networks for Computer Vision and Medical Image Analysis: A Surveycited by 10
  2. 2021Combining pretrained CNN feature extractors to enhance clustering of complex natural imagescited by 7
  3. 2025MHAFF: Multi-Head Attention Feature Fusion of CNN and Transformer for Cattle Identificationcited by 5

Built on by

Not cited yet.