mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Automated Constraint Specification for Job Scheduling by Regulating Generative Model with Domain-Specific Representation

arXiv 2510.02679 ↗First posted 3 Oct 2025cs.AIcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Advanced Planning and Scheduling (APS) systems have become indispensable for modern manufacturing operations, enabling optimized resource allocation and production efficiency in increasingly complex and dynamic environments. While algorithms for solving abstracted scheduling problems have been extensively investigated, the critical prerequisite of specifying manufacturing requirements into formal constraints remains manual and labor-intensive. Although recent advances of generative models, particularly Large Language Models (LLMs), show promise in automating constraint specification from heterogeneous raw manufacturing data, their direct application faces challenges due to natural language ambiguity, non-deterministic outputs, and limited domain-specific knowledge. This paper presents a constraint-centric architecture that regulates LLMs to perform reliable automated constraint specification for production scheduling. The architecture defines a hierarchical structural space organized across three levels, implemented through domain-specific representation to ensure precision and reliability while maintaining flexibility. Furthermore, an automated production scenario adaptation algorithm is designed and deployed to efficiently customize the architecture for specific manufacturing configurations. Experimental results demonstrate that the proposed approach successfully balances the generative capabilities of LLMs with the reliability requirements of manufacturing systems, significantly outperforming pure LLM-based approaches in constraint specification tasks.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 17 of its 76 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 3 Oct 2025.

Builds on

17 of 76 references.

References · 17

  1. 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,199
  2. 2021Finetuned Language Models Are Zero-Shot Learnerscited by 3,747
  3. 2023An Empirical Study of the Non-determinism of ChatGPT in Code Generationcited by 134
  4. 2023NL4Opt Competition: Formulating Optimization Problems Based on Their Natural Language Descriptionscited by 133
  5. 2024ORLM: A Customizable Framework in Training Large Models for Automated Optimization Modelingcited by 124
  6. 2024OptiMUS: Scalable Optimization Modeling with (MI)LP Solvers and Large Language Modelscited by 105
  7. 2024LLMOPT: Learning to Define and Solve General Optimization Problems from Scratchcited by 102
  8. 2022Augmenting Operations Research with Auto-Formulation of Optimization Models from Problem Descriptionscited by 54
  9. 2023Self-Improving for Zero-Shot Named Entity Recognition with Large Language Modelscited by 15
  10. 2025Decision Information Meets Large Language Models: The Future of Explainable Operations Researchcited by 9
  11. 2024AutoDSL: Automated domain-specific language design for structural representation of procedures with constraintscited by 6
  12. 2025Hierarchically Encapsulated Representation for Protocol Design in Self-Driving Labscited by 6
5 more
  1. 2024Expert-level protocol translation for self-driving labscited by 4
  2. 2022On the Complexity of Bayesian Generalizationcited by 3
  3. 2024Abstract Hardware Grounding towards the Automated Design of Automation Systemscited by 3
  4. 2024Constraint representation towards precise data-driven storytellingcited by 3
  5. 2025Targeted control of fast prototyping through domain-specific interfacecited by 1

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.

1 paper.