mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Robust Classification of Oral Cancer with Limited Training Data

arXiv 2510.01547 ↗First posted 2 Oct 2025cs.CV cs.LGcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Oral cancer ranks among the most prevalent cancers globally, with a particularly high mortality rate in regions lacking adequate healthcare access. Early diagnosis is crucial for reducing mortality; however, challenges persist due to limited oral health programs, inadequate infrastructure, and a shortage of healthcare practitioners. Conventional deep learning models, while promising, often rely on point estimates, leading to overconfidence and reduced reliability. Critically, these models require large datasets to mitigate overfitting and ensure generalizability, an unrealistic demand in settings with limited training data. To address these issues, we propose a hybrid model that combines a convolutional neural network (CNN) with Bayesian deep learning for oral cancer classification using small training sets. This approach employs variational inference to enhance reliability through uncertainty quantification. The model was trained on photographic color images captured by smartphones and evaluated on three distinct test datasets. The proposed method achieved 94% accuracy on a test dataset with a distribution similar to that of the training data, comparable to traditional CNN performance. Notably, for real-world photographic image data, despite limitations and variations differing from the training dataset, the proposed model demonstrated superior generalizability, achieving 88% accuracy on diverse datasets compared to 72.94% for traditional CNNs, even with a smaller dataset. Confidence analysis revealed that the model exhibits low uncertainty (high confidence) for correctly classified samples and high uncertainty (low confidence) for misclassified samples. These results underscore the effectiveness of Bayesian inference in data-scarce environments in enhancing early oral cancer diagnosis by improving model reliability and generalizability.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 4 of its 19 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 2 Oct 2025.

Builds on

4 of 19 references.

References · 4

  1. 2015Dropout as a Bayesian Approximation: Representing Model Uncertainty in Deep Learningcited by 4,416
  2. 2015Weight Uncertainty in Neural Networkscited by 554
  3. 2022Bayesian Learning for Neural Networks: an algorithmic surveycited by 22
  4. 2020Explanation and Use of Uncertainty Quantified by Bayesian Neural Network Classifiers for Breast Histopathology Imagescited by 13

Built on by

Not cited yet.