Safe Reinforcement Learning-Based Vibration Control: Overcoming Training Risks with LQR Guidance
On the map: Deep reinforcement learning methods → Safe and constrained RL
Abstract (arXiv)
Structural vibrations induced by external excitations pose significant risks, including safety hazards for occupants, structural damage, and increased maintenance costs. While conventional model-based control strategies, such as Linear Quadratic Regulator (LQR), effectively mitigate vibrations, their reliance on accurate system models necessitates tedious system identification. This tedious system identification process can be avoided by using a model-free Reinforcement learning (RL) method. RL controllers derive their policies solely from observed structural behaviour, eliminating the requirement for an explicit structural model. For an RL controller to be truly model-free, its training must occur on the actual physical system rather than in simulation. However, during this training phase, the RL controller lacks prior knowledge and it exerts control force on the structure randomly, which can potentially harm the structure. To mitigate this risk, we propose guiding the RL controller using a Linear Quadratic Regulator (LQR) controller. While LQR control typically relies on an accurate structural model for optimal performance, our observations indicate that even an LQR controller based on an entirely incorrect model outperforms the uncontrolled scenario. Motivated by this finding, we introduce a hybrid control framework that integrates both LQR and RL controllers. In this approach, the LQR policy is derived from a randomly selected model and its parameters. As this LQR policy does not require knowledge of the true or an approximate structural model the overall framework remains model-free. This hybrid approach eliminates dependency on explicit system models while minimizing exploration risks inherent in naive RL implementations. As per our knowledge, this is the first study to address the critical training safety challenge of RL-based vibration control and provide a validated solution.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Safe and constrained RL, one of 15 directions in Deep reinforcement learning methods. Builds on 1 of its 10 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 29 Sep 2025.
Builds on
1 of 10 references.
References · 1
Built on by
Not cited yet.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2021Two-step reinforcement learning for model-free redesign of nonlinear optimal regulator
- 2024Safe Deep Model-Based Reinforcement Learning with Lyapunov Functions
- 2025Safe Learning Control with Optimality and Stability Guarantees
- 2024Disturbance Observer-based Control Barrier Functions with Residual Model Learning for Safe Reinforcement Learning
- 2024Safety Filtering While Training: Improving the Performance and Sample Efficiency of Reinforcement Learning Agents
- 2024MR-ARL: Model Reference Adaptive Reinforcement Learning for Robustly Stable On-Policy Data-Driven LQR
- 2025Safe model-based Reinforcement Learning via Model Predictive Control and Control Barrier Functions
- 2024Guiding Reinforcement Learning with Incomplete System Dynamics