mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Jailbreaking LLMs via Semantically Relevant Nested Scenarios with Targeted Toxic Knowledge

arXiv 2510.01223 ↗First posted 22 Sep 2025cs.CR cs.CLcited by 2

On the map: LLM safety and security → Jailbreaking

Abstract (arXiv)

Large Language Models (LLMs) have demonstrated remarkable capabilities in various tasks. However, they remain exposed to jailbreak attacks, eliciting harmful responses. The nested scenario strategy has been increasingly adopted across various methods, demonstrating immense potential. Nevertheless, these methods are easily detectable due to their prominent malicious intentions. In this work, we are the first to find and systematically verify that LLMs' alignment defenses are not sensitive to nested scenarios, where these scenarios are highly semantically relevant to the queries and incorporate targeted toxic knowledge. This is a crucial yet insufficiently explored direction. Based on this, we propose RTS-Attack (Semantically Relevant Nested Scenarios with Targeted Toxic Knowledge), an adaptive and automated framework to examine LLMs' alignment. By building scenarios highly relevant to the queries and integrating targeted toxic knowledge, RTS-Attack bypasses the alignment defenses of LLMs. Moreover, the jailbreak prompts generated by RTS-Attack are free from harmful queries, leading to outstanding concealment. Extensive experiments demonstrate that RTS-Attack exhibits superior performance in both efficiency and universality compared to the baselines across diverse advanced LLMs, including GPT-4o, Llama3-70b, and Gemini-pro. Our complete code is available at https://github.com/nercode/Work. WARNING: THIS PAPER CONTAINS POTENTIALLY HARMFUL CONTENT.

Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Jailbreaking, one of 12 directions in LLM safety and security. Builds on 32 of its 37 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 22 Sep 2025.

Builds on

32 of 37 references.

Closest ancestors · 17

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2025from Benign import Toxic: Jailbreaking the Language Model via Adversarial Metaphors25 Feb
  2. 2025Rewrite to Jailbreak: Discover Learnable and Transferable Implicit Harmfulness Instruction16 Feb
  3. 2025Reasoning-Augmented Conversation for Multi-Turn Jailbreak Attacks on Large Language Models16 Feb
  4. 2025QueryAttack: Jailbreaking Aligned Large Language Models Using Structured Non-natural Query Language13 Feb
  5. 2025Dagger Behind Smile: Fool LLMs with a Happy Ending Story19 Jan
  6. 2024Don't Listen To Me: Understanding and Exploring Jailbreak Prompts of Large Language Models26 Mar
  7. 2024Play Guessing Game with LLM: Indirect Jailbreak Attack with Implicit Clues14 Feb
  8. 2024How Johnny Can Persuade LLMs to Jailbreak Them: Rethinking Persuasion to Challenge AI Safety by Humanizing LLMs12 Jan
  9. 2023A Wolf in Sheep's Clothing: Generalized Nested Jailbreak Prompts can Fool Large Language Models Easily14 Nov
  10. 2023DeepInception: Hypnotize Large Language Model to Be Jailbreaker6 Nov
  11. 2023Jailbreaking Black Box Large Language Models in Twenty Queries12 Oct
  12. 2023AutoDAN: Generating Stealthy Jailbreak Prompts on Aligned Large Language Models3 Oct
5 more
  1. 2023GPTFUZZER: Red Teaming Large Language Models with Auto-Generated Jailbreak Prompts19 Sep
  2. 2023FuzzLLM: A Novel and Universal Fuzzing Framework for Proactively Discovering Jailbreak Vulnerabilities in Large Language Models11 Sep
  3. 2023GPT-4 Is Too Smart To Be Safe: Stealthy Chat with LLMs via Cipher12 Aug
  4. 2023Universal and Transferable Adversarial Attacks on Aligned Language Models27 Jul
  5. 2023Jailbroken: How Does LLM Safety Training Fail?5 Jul

Other references · 15

  1. 2023Direct Preference Optimization: Your Language Model is Secretly a Reward Modelcited by 7,916
  2. 2022Training a Helpful and Harmless Assistant with Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedbackcited by 3,634
  3. 2023AutoGen: Enabling Next-Gen LLM Applications via Multi-Agent Conversationcited by 1,906
  4. 2020RealToxicityPrompts: Evaluating Neural Toxic Degeneration in Language Modelscited by 1,235
  5. 2023Fine-tuning Aligned Language Models Compromises Safety, Even When Users Do Not Intend To!cited by 1,106
  6. 2021Ethical and social risks of harm from Language Modelscited by 957
  7. 2023BeaverTails: Towards Improved Safety Alignment of LLM via a Human-Preference Datasetcited by 828
  8. 2022Red Teaming Language Models to Reduce Harms: Methods, Scaling Behaviors, and Lessons Learnedcited by 702
  9. 2023DecodingTrust: A Comprehensive Assessment of Trustworthiness in GPT Modelscited by 505
  10. 2024ArtPrompt: ASCII Art-based Jailbreak Attacks against Aligned LLMscited by 197
  11. 2023Planning with Large Language Models for Code Generationcited by 179
  12. 2025H-CoT: Hijacking the Chain-of-Thought Safety Reasoning Mechanism to Jailbreak Large Reasoning Models, Including OpenAI o1/o3, DeepSeek-R1, and Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinkingcited by 94
3 more
  1. 2023Use of LLMs for Illicit Purposes: Threats, Prevention Measures, and Vulnerabilitiescited by 76
  2. 2024CodeAttack: Revealing Safety Generalization Challenges of Large Language Models via Code Completioncited by 70
  3. 2024CoSafe: Evaluating Large Language Model Safety in Multi-Turn Dialogue Coreferencecited by 51

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 2.

2 papers.