mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Integrating AI and Ensemble Forecasting: Explainable Materials Planning with Scorecards and Trend Insights for a Large-Scale Manufacturer

arXiv 2510.01006 ↗First posted 1 Oct 2025cs.AI cs.LGcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

This paper presents a practical architecture for after-sales demand forecasting and monitoring that unifies a revenue- and cluster-aware ensemble of statistical, machine-learning, and deep-learning models with a role-driven analytics layer for scorecards and trend diagnostics. The framework ingests exogenous signals (installed base, pricing, macro indicators, life cycle, seasonality) and treats COVID-19 as a distinct regime, producing country-part forecasts with calibrated intervals. A Pareto-aware segmentation forecasts high-revenue items individually and pools the long tail via clusters, while horizon-aware ensembling aligns weights with business-relevant losses (e.g., WMAPE). Beyond forecasts, a performance scorecard delivers decision-focused insights: accuracy within tolerance thresholds by revenue share and count, bias decomposition (over- vs under-forecast), geographic and product-family hotspots, and ranked root causes tied to high-impact part-country pairs. A trend module tracks trajectories of MAPE/WMAPE and bias across recent months, flags entities that are improving or deteriorating, detects change points aligned with known regimes, and attributes movements to lifecycle and seasonal factors. LLMs are embedded in the analytics layer to generate role-aware narratives and enforce reporting contracts. They standardize business definitions, automate quality checks and reconciliations, and translate quantitative results into concise, explainable summaries for planners and executives. The system exposes a reproducible workflow -- request specification, model execution, database-backed artifacts, and AI-generated narratives -- so planners can move from "How accurate are we now?" to "Where is accuracy heading and which levers should we pull?", closing the loop between forecasting, monitoring, and inventory decisions across more than 90 countries and about 6,000 parts.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 12 of its 26 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 1 Oct 2025.

Builds on

12 of 26 references.

References · 12

  1. 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,419
  2. 2023LLaMA: Open and Efficient Foundation Language Modelscited by 14,132
  3. 2021On the Opportunities and Risks of Foundation Modelscited by 4,033
  4. 2021The Power of Scale for Parameter-Efficient Prompt Tuningcited by 3,795
  5. 2023QLoRA: Efficient Finetuning of Quantized LLMscited by 3,418
  6. 2018Deep contextualized word representationscited by 2,290
  7. 2017DeepAR: Probabilistic Forecasting with Autoregressive Recurrent Networkscited by 1,013
  8. 2023FrugalGPT: How to Use Large Language Models While Reducing Cost and Improving Performancecited by 853
  9. 2019N-BEATS: Neural basis expansion analysis for interpretable time series forecastingcited by 753
  10. 2023Prompt Injection attack against LLM-integrated Applicationscited by 605
  11. 2022Using DeepSpeed and Megatron to Train Megatron-Turing NLG 530B, A Large-Scale Generative Language Modelcited by 559
  12. 2020A Survey of the State of Explainable AI for Natural Language Processingcited by 206

Built on by

Not cited yet.