mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Understanding Sensitivity of Differential Attention through the Lens of Adversarial Robustness

arXiv 2510.00517 ↗First posted 1 Oct 2025cs.LG cs.CRcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Differential Attention (DA) has been proposed as a refinement to standard attention, suppressing redundant or noisy context through a subtractive structure and thereby reducing contextual hallucination. While this design sharpens task-relevant focus, we show that it also introduces a structural fragility under adversarial perturbations. Our theoretical analysis identifies negative gradient alignment-a configuration encouraged by DA's subtraction-as the key driver of sensitivity amplification, leading to increased gradient norms and elevated local Lipschitz constants. We empirically validate this Fragile Principle through systematic experiments on ViT/DiffViT and evaluations of pretrained CLIP/DiffCLIP, spanning five datasets in total. These results demonstrate higher attack success rates, frequent gradient opposition, and stronger local sensitivity compared to standard attention. Furthermore, depth-dependent experiments reveal a robustness crossover: stacking DA layers attenuates small perturbations via depth-dependent noise cancellation, though this protection fades under larger attack budgets. Overall, our findings uncover a fundamental trade-off: DA improves discriminative focus on clean inputs but increases adversarial vulnerability, underscoring the need to jointly design for selectivity and robustness in future attention mechanisms.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 36 of its 48 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 1 Oct 2025.

Builds on

36 of 48 references.

References · 36

  1. 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 59,932
  2. 2021Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervisioncited by 33,456
  3. 2020An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scalecited by 29,915
  4. 2014Microsoft COCO: Common Objects in Contextcited by 17,498
  5. 2017Towards Deep Learning Models Resistant to Adversarial Attackscited by 6,326
  6. 2016Towards Evaluating the Robustness of Neural Networkscited by 2,976
  7. 2020Reliable evaluation of adversarial robustness with an ensemble of diverse parameter-free attackscited by 1,442
  8. 2021Conceptual 12M: Pushing Web-Scale Image-Text Pre-Training To Recognize Long-Tail Visual Conceptscited by 1,209
  9. 2019Attention is not Explanationcited by 916
  10. 2020On Faithfulness and Factuality in Abstractive Summarizationcited by 895
  11. 2019Square Attack: a query-efficient black-box adversarial attack via random searchcited by 682
  12. 2023OPERA: Alleviating Hallucination in Multi-Modal Large Language Models via Over-Trust Penalty and Retrospection-Allocationcited by 468
24 more
  1. 2019Is Attention Interpretable?cited by 387
  2. 2019Minimally distorted Adversarial Examples with a Fast Adaptive Boundary Attackcited by 333
  3. 2021Are Transformers More Robust Than CNNs?cited by 187
  4. 2020The Lipschitz Constant of Self-Attentioncited by 171
  5. 2023Stabilizing Transformer Training by Preventing Attention Entropy Collapsecited by 154
  6. 2021IA-RED2: Interpretability-Aware Redundancy Reduction for Vision Transformerscited by 127
  7. 2020InfoBERT: Improving Robustness of Language Models from An Information Theoretic Perspectivecited by 92
  8. 2021On Improving Adversarial Transferability of Vision Transformerscited by 70
  9. 2022When Adversarial Training Meets Vision Transformers: Recipes from Training to Architecturecited by 64
  10. 2022Patch-Fool: Are Vision Transformers Always Robust Against Adversarial Perturbations?cited by 47
  11. 2023How Smooth Is Attention?cited by 44
  12. 2020Why Attentions May Not Be Interpretable?cited by 41
  13. 2021Understanding and Improving Robustness of Vision Transformers through Patch-based Negative Augmentationcited by 40
  14. 2017A Regularized Framework for Sparse and Structured Neural Attentioncited by 38
  15. 2021Lipschitz Normalization for Self-Attention Layers with Application to Graph Neural Networkscited by 38
  16. 2020Sparse and Continuous Attention Mechanismscited by 37
  17. 2018On the Structural Sensitivity of Deep Convolutional Networks to the Directions of Fourier Basis Functionscited by 31
  18. 2021Is Sparse Attention more Interpretable?cited by 31
  19. 2024Weight decay induces low-rank attention layerscited by 27
  20. 2022On the Interpretability of Attention Networkscited by 5
  21. 2024Understanding Likelihood of Normalizing Flow and Image Complexity through the Lens of Out-of-Distribution Detectioncited by 5
  22. 2025LipShiFT: A Certifiably Robust Shift-based Vision Transformercited by 3
  23. 2025DiffCLIP: Differential Attention Meets CLIPcited by 2
  24. 2025Differential Mambacited by 2

Built on by

Not cited yet.