A universal compression theory for lottery ticket hypothesis and neural scaling laws
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
When training large-scale models, the performance typically scales with the number of parameters and the dataset size according to a slow power law. A fundamental theoretical and practical question is whether comparable performance can be achieved with significantly smaller models and substantially less data. In this work, we provide a positive and constructive answer. We prove that a generic permutation-invariant function of d objects can be asymptotically compressed into a function of operatornamepolylog d objects with vanishing error, which is proved to be the optimal compression rate. This theorem yields two key implications: (Ia) a large neural network can be compressed to polylogarithmic width while preserving its learning dynamics; (Ib) a large dataset can be compressed to polylogarithmic size while leaving the loss landscape of the corresponding model unchanged. Implication (Ia) directly establishes a proof of the dynamical lottery ticket hypothesis, which states that any ordinary network can be strongly compressed such that the learning dynamics and result remain unchanged. (Ib) shows that a neural scaling law of the form L~ d-α can be boosted to an arbitrarily fast power law decay, and ultimately to exp(-α' √[m]d).
Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 13 of its 31 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 1 Oct 2025.
Builds on
13 of 31 references.
References · 13
- 2020Scaling Laws for Neural Language Modelscited by 6,586
- 2015Deep Compression: Compressing Deep Neural Networks with Pruning, Trained Quantization and Huffman Codingcited by 2,329
- 2018The Lottery Ticket Hypothesis: Finding Sparse, Trainable Neural Networkscited by 2,262
- 2013Exact solutions to the nonlinear dynamics of learning in deep linear neural networkscited by 763
- 2022Beyond neural scaling laws: beating power law scaling via data pruningcited by 528
- 2020Scaling Laws for Autoregressive Generative Modelingcited by 522
- 2020Proving the Lottery Ticket Hypothesis: Pruning is All You Needcited by 201
- 2020Optimal Lottery Tickets via SubsetSum: Logarithmic Over-Parameterization is Sufficientcited by 81
- 2019Weight-space symmetry in deep networks gives rise to permutation saddles, connected by equal-loss valleys across the loss landscapecited by 63
- 2023Symmetry Induces Structure and Constraint of Learningcited by 25
- 2021Effective dimension of machine learning modelscited by 14
- 2023Universal Representation of Permutation-Invariant Functions on Vectors and Tensorscited by 10
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 1; 2026: 1.
2 papers.
- 2025Topological Invariance and Breakdown in Learningcited by 1
- 2026Width-Independent Compressibility of Deep Neural Networkscited by 0
- 2026Width-Independent Compressibility of Deep Neural Networks22 Aug 2026
- 2025Topological Invariance and Breakdown in Learning3 Oct 2025