Gradual Capacity Growth for Sparse Network Discovery
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Sparse neural network methods typically assume that the target sparsity (or density) is fixed in advance, even though the relationship between network capacity and performance is generally unknown and task-dependent. Existing approaches (including iterative pruning, dynamic sparse training, and pruning at initialization) either rely on dense pretraining, incur substantial retraining cost, or require a preset sparsity budget. We propose Gradual Capacity Growth (GCG), a constructive sparse-to-dense training framework that allocates network capacity progressively during training. Starting from a sparse seed network, GCG grows new connections in stages using PathGrow, a probabilistic path-based growth rule that biases additions toward high-signal input-output pathways while preserving structural diversity. Growth is interleaved with limited training, and a lightweight performance-density extrapolation rule is used to estimate the smallest density beyond which further capacity increases yield diminishing accuracy gains. Experiments on CIFAR, TinyImageNet, and ImageNet show that GCG efficiently identifies sparse networks that achieve near-dense performance at moderate densities, without requiring dense pretraining or exhaustive retraining at each sparsity level. While growth-only methods do not reach the extreme sparsity achievable by pruning or dynamic reallocation techniques, GCG substantially reduces total training cost compared to iterative magnitude pruning and provides a practical mechanism for exploring the accuracy-density tradeoff under limited optimization budgets.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 22 of its 24 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 30 Sep 2025.
Builds on
22 of 24 references.
References · 22
- 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 52,096
- 2020An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scalecited by 30,186
- 2018The Lottery Ticket Hypothesis: Finding Sparse, Trainable Neural Networkscited by 2,262
- 2018SNIP: Single-shot Network Pruning based on Connection Sensitivitycited by 812
- 2019Fine-Grained Analysis of Optimization and Generalization for Overparameterized Two-Layer Neural Networkscited by 566
- 2021Sparsity in Deep Learning: Pruning and growth for efficient inference and training in neural networkscited by 527
- 2019Rigging the Lottery: Making All Tickets Winnerscited by 495
- 2020Pruning neural networks without any data by iteratively conserving synaptic flowcited by 479
- 2020Picking Winning Tickets Before Training by Preserving Gradient Flowcited by 471
- 2021Rethinking Spatial Dimensions of Vision Transformerscited by 361
- 2017Scalable Training of Artificial Neural Networks with Adaptive Sparse Connectivity inspired by Network Sciencecited by 328
- 2019What's Hidden in a Randomly Weighted Neural Network?cited by 237
10 more
- 2019Sparse Networks from Scratch: Faster Training without Losing Performancecited by 213
- 2019Parameter Efficient Training of Deep Convolutional Neural Networks by Dynamic Sparse Reparameterizationcited by 189
- 2020Soft Threshold Weight Reparameterization for Learnable Sparsitycited by 151
- 2020The Break-Even Point on Optimization Trajectories of Deep Neural Networkscited by 150
- 2021Vision Transformer for Small-Size Datasetscited by 122
- 2022GradMax: Growing Neural Networks using Gradient Informationcited by 66
- 2021Firefly Neural Architecture Descent: a General Approach for Growing Neural Networkscited by 49
- 2020PHEW: Constructing Sparse Networks that Learn Fast and Generalize Well without Training Datacited by 17
- 2021A Unified Paths Perspective for Pruning at Initializationcited by 14
- 2024Always-Sparse Training by Growing Connections with Guided Stochastic Explorationcited by 1
Built on by
Not cited yet.