mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

BuildBench: Benchmarking LLM Agents on Compiling Real-World Open-Source Software

arXiv 2509.25248 ↗First posted 27 Sep 2025cs.SE cs.AI cs.PLcited by 2

On the map: LLM agents and tool use → Software engineering coding agents

Abstract (arXiv)

Automatically compiling open-source software (OSS) projects is a vital, labor-intensive, and complex task, which makes it a good challenge for LLM Agents. Existing methods rely on manually curated rules and workflows, which cannot adapt to OSS that requires customized configuration or environment setup. Recent attempts using Large Language Models (LLMs) used selective evaluation on a subset of highly rated OSS, a practice that underestimates the realistic challenges of OSS compilation. In practice, compilation instructions are often absent, dependencies are undocumented, and successful builds may even require patching source files or modifying build scripts. We propose a more challenging and realistic benchmark, BUILD-BENCH, comprising OSS that are more diverse in quality, scale, and characteristics. Furthermore, we propose a strong baseline LLM-based agent, OSS-BUILD-AGENT, an effective system with enhanced build instruction retrieval module that achieves state-of-the-art performance on BUILD-BENCH and is adaptable to heterogeneous OSS characteristics. We also provide detailed analysis regarding different compilation method design choices and their influence to the whole task, offering insights to guide future advances. We believe performance on BUILD-BENCH can faithfully reflect an agent's ability to tackle compilation as a complex software engineering tasks, and, as such, our benchmark will spur innovation with a significant impact on downstream applications in the fields of software development and software security.

Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Software engineering coding agents, one of 16 directions in LLM agents and tool use. Builds on 22 of its 29 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 27 Sep 2025.

Builds on

22 of 29 references.

Closest ancestors · 4

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2025CompileAgent: Automated Real-World Repo-Level Compilation with Tool-Integrated LLM-based Agent System7 May
  2. 2025Why Do Multi-Agent LLM Systems Fail?17 Mar
  3. 2024Beyond pip install: Evaluating LLM Agents for the Automated Installation of Python Projects9 Dec
  4. 2024Self-Organized Agents: A LLM Multi-Agent Framework toward Ultra Large-Scale Code Generation and Optimization2 Apr

Other references · 18

  1. 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,419
  2. 2023LLaMA: Open and Efficient Foundation Language Modelscited by 14,132
  3. 2020Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Knowledge-Intensive NLP Taskscited by 9,297
  4. 2022ReAct: Synergizing Reasoning and Acting in Language Modelscited by 8,695
  5. 2021Evaluating Large Language Models Trained on Codecited by 8,320
  6. 2022Large Language Models are Zero-Shot Reasonerscited by 4,374
  7. 2023Reflexion: Language Agents with Verbal Reinforcement Learningcited by 4,276
  8. 2023SWE-bench: Can Language Models Resolve Real-World GitHub Issues?cited by 3,373
  9. 2024τ-bench: A Benchmark for Tool-Agent-User Interaction in Real-World Domainscited by 1,402
  10. 2024Agent Workflow Memorycited by 383
  11. 2024The Good, The Bad, and The Greedy: Evaluation of LLMs Should Not Ignore Non-Determinismcited by 116
  12. 2025Learn-by-interact: A Data-Centric Framework for Self-Adaptive Agents in Realistic Environmentscited by 95
6 more
  1. 2023No More Manual Tests? Evaluating and Improving ChatGPT for Unit Test Generationcited by 82
  2. 2024CoverUp: Effective High Coverage Test Generation for Pythoncited by 38
  3. 2019DIRE: A Neural Approach to Decompiled Identifier Namingcited by 36
  4. 2024Assemblage: Automatic Binary Dataset Construction for Machine Learningcited by 12
  5. 2025BinPool: A Dataset of Vulnerabilities for Binary Security Analysiscited by 2
  6. 2021ROMEO: Exploring Juliet through the Lens of Assembly Languagecited by 1

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 1; 2026: 1.

2 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2026Evaluating LLM Agents on Automated Software Analysis Tasks
  2. 2026HWE-Bench: Benchmarking LLM Agents on Real-World Hardware Bug Repair Tasks
  3. 2025SetupBench: Assessing Software Engineering Agents' Ability to Bootstrap Development Environments
  4. 2025CXXCrafter: An LLM-Based Agent for Automated C/C++ Open Source Software Building
  5. 2026RepoZero: Can LLMs Generate a Code Repository from Scratch?
  6. 2026ArchBench: Benchmarking Generative-AI for Software Architecture Tasks ↗
  7. 2026E2E-SWE: Benchmarking LLMs on Building Working Codebases from Scratch
  8. 2025Automatically Benchmarking LLM Code Agents through Agent-Driven Annotation and Evaluation