Uncertainty-Aware Deep Learning for Wildfire Danger Forecasting
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Wildfires are among the most severe natural hazards, posing a significant threat to both humans and natural ecosystems. The growing risk of wildfires increases the demand for forecasting models that are not only accurate but also reliable. Deep Learning (DL) has shown promise in predicting wildfire danger; however, its adoption is hindered by concerns over the reliability of its predictions, some of which stem from the lack of uncertainty quantification. To address this challenge, we present an uncertainty-aware DL framework that jointly captures epistemic (model) and aleatoric (data) uncertainty to enhance short-term wildfire danger forecasting. In the next-day forecasting, our best-performing model improves the F1 Score by 2.3% and reduces the Expected Calibration Error by 2.1% compared to a deterministic baseline, enhancing both predictive skill and calibration. Our experiments confirm the reliability of the uncertainty estimates and illustrate their practical utility for decision support, including the identification of uncertainty thresholds for rejecting low-confidence predictions and the generation of well-calibrated wildfire danger maps with accompanying uncertainty layers. Extending the forecast horizon up to ten days, we observe that aleatoric uncertainty increases with time, showing greater variability in environmental conditions, while epistemic uncertainty remains stable. Finally, we show that although the two uncertainty types may be redundant in low-uncertainty cases, they provide complementary insights under more challenging conditions, underscoring the value of their joint modeling for robust wildfire danger prediction. In summary, our approach significantly improves the accuracy and reliability of wildfire danger forecasting, advancing the development of trustworthy wildfire DL systems.
Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 32 of its 87 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 29 Sep 2025.
Builds on
32 of 87 references.
References · 32
- 2017On Calibration of Modern Neural Networkscited by 4,960
- 2015Dropout as a Bayesian Approximation: Representing Model Uncertainty in Deep Learningcited by 4,448
- 2016Simple and Scalable Predictive Uncertainty Estimation using Deep Ensemblescited by 3,926
- 2017What Uncertainties Do We Need in Bayesian Deep Learning for Computer Vision?cited by 2,352
- 2019Can You Trust Your Model's Uncertainty? Evaluating Predictive Uncertainty Under Dataset Shiftcited by 1,287
- 2019Aleatoric and Epistemic Uncertainty in Machine Learning: An Introduction to Concepts and Methodscited by 913
- 2018Evidential Deep Learning to Quantify Classification Uncertaintycited by 732
- 2018Predictive Uncertainty Estimation via Prior Networkscited by 557
- 2015Weight Uncertainty in Neural Networkscited by 554
- 2020Hands-on Bayesian Neural Networks -- a Tutorial for Deep Learning Userscited by 338
- 2015Probabilistic Backpropagation for Scalable Learning of Bayesian Neural Networkscited by 295
- 2018Aleatoric uncertainty estimation with test-time augmentation for medical image segmentation with convolutional neural networkscited by 280
20 more
- 2021Deep Deterministic Uncertainty: A Simple Baselinecited by 200
- 2019Evaluating Scalable Bayesian Deep Learning Methods for Robust Computer Visioncited by 182
- 2017Multiplicative Normalizing Flows for Variational Bayesian Neural Networkscited by 157
- 2018Evaluating Bayesian Deep Learning Methods for Semantic Segmentationcited by 143
- 2024Benchmarking Uncertainty Disentanglement: Specialized Uncertainties for Specialized Taskscited by 78
- 2020The Case for Bayesian Deep Learningcited by 69
- 2020A review of machine learning applications in wildfire science and managementcited by 65
- 2020Gradients as a Measure of Uncertainty in Neural Networkscited by 55
- 2018Classification Uncertainty of Deep Neural Networks Based on Gradient Informationcited by 43
- 2020Towards Maximizing the Representation Gap between In-Domain & Out-of-Distribution Examplescited by 40
- 2019Density estimation in representation space to predict model uncertaintycited by 27
- 2021Towards a Collective Agenda on AI for Earth Science Data Analysiscited by 27
- 2023Mesogeos: A multi-purpose dataset for data-driven wildfire modeling in the Mediterraneancited by 19
- 2021Deep Learning Methods for Daily Wildfire Danger Forecastingcited by 17
- 2019Bayesian-Deep-Learning Estimation of Earthquake Location from Single-Station Observationscited by 16
- 2020Deep Learning Models for Predicting Wildfires from Historical Remote-Sensing Datacited by 14
- 2020Convolutional LSTM Neural Networks for Modeling Wildland Fire Dynamicscited by 11
- 2023TeleViT: Teleconnection-driven Transformers Improve Subseasonal to Seasonal Wildfire Forecastingcited by 11
- 2025Probabilistic Machine Learning for Noisy Labels in Earth Observationcited by 6
- 2023FLOGA: A machine learning ready dataset, a benchmark and a novel deep learning model for burnt area mapping with Sentinel-2cited by 4
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 2; 2026: 2.
4 papers.
- 2025FireScope: Wildfire Risk Raster Prediction with a Chain-of-Thought Oraclecited by 2
- 2025BCWildfire: A Long-term Multi-factor Dataset and Deep Learning Benchmark for Boreal Wildfire Risk Predictioncited by 2
- 2026Set Prediction for Next-Day Active Fire Forecastingcited by 1
- 2026Trustworthy Data-Driven Wildfire Risk Prediction and Understanding in Western Canadacited by 0
- 2026Set Prediction for Next-Day Active Fire Forecasting11 May 2026
- 2026Trustworthy Data-Driven Wildfire Risk Prediction and Understanding in Western Canada4 Jan 2026
- 2025FireScope: Wildfire Risk Raster Prediction with a Chain-of-Thought Oracle21 Nov 2025
- 2025BCWildfire: A Long-term Multi-factor Dataset and Deep Learning Benchmark for Boreal Wildfire Risk Prediction17 Nov 2025