Expanding Computation Spaces of LLMs at Inference Time
On the map: LLM reasoning → Test-time compute and efficient thinking
Abstract (arXiv)
Chain-of-thought (CoT) rationale enables language models to use additional task-related text for problem-solving, benefiting not only from detailed reasoning steps but also from the expanded computational space of longer inputs. Prior work has trained filler or special tokens to serve as additional computation spaces. In this study, we investigate whether language models can leverage artificially inserted sequences of filler tokens solely at inference. We first identify effective token types, numbers, and insertion locations, then examine at what stage of training models begin to exploit the expanded computation space, and finally analyze dynamics within these spaces via attention maps. Experiments on models ranging from 1.7B to 32B across open-domain QA and math tasks show that appropriate token types and counts vary, but placing filler tokens directly before the final 'Answer:' token is most effective. Smaller models benefit most, up to 12.372 percentage points in SmolLM2-1.7B-Instruct, indicating that these spaces act as additional computational capacity rather than redundant input. Attention maps reveal that expanded spaces often continue the original attention mechanism and sometimes focus on questions or answer options, suggesting meaningful computation for problem-solving.
Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Test-time compute and efficient thinking, one of 17 directions in LLM reasoning. Builds on 18 of its 29 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 29 Sep 2025.
Builds on
18 of 29 references.
Closest ancestors · 3
Same direction, newest first
- 2025The Price of a Second Thought: On the Evaluation of Reasoning Efficiency in Large Language Models28 May
- 2025Reasoning Models Better Express Their Confidence20 May
- 2023Think before you speak: Training Language Models With Pause Tokens3 Oct
Other references · 15
- 2022Chain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language Modelscited by 12,459
- 2020Measuring Massive Multitask Language Understandingcited by 7,963
- 2025DeepSeek-R1: Incentivizing Reasoning Capability in LLMs via Reinforcement Learningcited by 6,330
- 2022Self-Consistency Improves Chain of Thought Reasoning in Language Modelscited by 5,708
- 2018Think you have Solved Question Answering? Try ARC, the AI2 Reasoning Challengecited by 4,886
- 2024GPT-4o System Cardcited by 4,588
- 2023Let's Verify Step by Stepcited by 3,789
- 2023Lost in the Middle: How Language Models Use Long Contextscited by 3,455
- 2025Gemma 3 Technical Reportcited by 1,824
- 2023Measuring Faithfulness in Chain-of-Thought Reasoningcited by 703
- 2025From System 1 to System 2: A Survey of Reasoning Large Language Modelscited by 320
- 2024Quiet-STaR: Language Models Can Teach Themselves to Think Before Speakingcited by 301
3 more
- 2024Let's Think Dot by Dot: Hidden Computation in Transformer Language Modelscited by 191
- 2023System 2 Attention (is something you might need too)cited by 89
- 2024Thinking Tokens for Language Modelingcited by 24
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 2.
2 papers.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2024Extending Token Computation for LLM Reasoning
- 2026Think Deep, Not Just Long: Measuring LLM Reasoning Effort via Deep-Thinking Tokens
- 2025Don't Take Things Out of Context: Attention Intervention for Enhancing Chain-of-Thought Reasoning in Large Language Models
- 2025Beyond Chains of Thought: Benchmarking Latent-Space Reasoning Abilities in Large Language Models
- 2025Attention Reveals More Than Tokens: Training-Free Long-Context Reasoning with Attention-guided Retrieval
- 2025How Well do LLMs Compress Their Own Chain-of-Thought? A Token Complexity Approach
- 2026When More Thinking Hurts: Overthinking in LLM Test-Time Compute Scaling
- 2025Rethinking Thinking Tokens: LLMs as Improvement Operators