From Neural Networks to Logical Theories: The Correspondence between Fibring Modal Logics and Fibring Neural Networks
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Fibring of modal logics is a well-established formalism for combining countable families of modal logics into a single fibred language with common semantics, characterized by fibred models. Inspired by this formalism, fibring of neural networks was introduced as a neurosymbolic framework for combining learning and reasoning in neural networks. Fibring of neural networks uses the (pre-)activations of a trained network to evaluate a fibring function computing the weights of another network whose outputs are injected back into the original network. However, the exact correspondence between fibring of neural networks and fibring of modal logics was never formally established. In this paper, we close this gap by formalizing the idea of fibred models compatible with fibred neural networks. Using this correspondence, we then derive non-uniform logical expressiveness results for Graph Neural Networks (GNNs), Graph Attention Networks (GATs) and Transformer encoders. Longer-term, the goal of this paper is to open the way for the use of fibring as a formalism for interpreting the logical theories learnt by neural networks with the tools of computational logic.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 13 of its 23 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 28 Sep 2025.
Builds on
13 of 23 references.
References · 13
- 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 60,361
- 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,399
- 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,419
- 2023GPT-4 Technical Reportcited by 18,396
- 2021Geometric Deep Learning: Grids, Groups, Graphs, Geodesics, and Gaugescited by 1,167
- 2020Neurosymbolic AI: The 3rd Wavecited by 255
- 2020Graph Neural Networks Meet Neural-Symbolic Computing: A Survey and Perspectivecited by 95
- 2022Formal Language Recognition by Hard Attention Transformers: Perspectives from Circuit Complexitycited by 93
- 2023Logical Languages Accepted by Transformer Encoders with Hard Attentioncited by 38
- 2023The Descriptive Complexity of Graph Neural Networkscited by 26
- 2024Decidability of Graph Neural Networks via Logical Characterizationscited by 14
- 2024A Logic for Reasoning About Aggregate-Combine Graph Neural Networkscited by 10
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 1.
1 paper.
- 2025Neurosymbolic Deep Learning Semanticscited by 0
- 2025Neurosymbolic Deep Learning Semantics4 Nov 2025