mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

RCI: A Score for Evaluating Global and Local Reasoning in Multimodal Benchmarks

arXiv 2509.23673 ↗First posted 28 Sep 2025cs.CV cs.AI cs.CLcited by 2

On the map: LLM reasoning → Multimodal reasoning

also in 1 more
Abstract (arXiv)

Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) have achieved impressive results on vision-language benchmarks, yet it remains unclear whether these benchmarks assess genuine global reasoning or allow success via localized visual cues. Existing evaluation methods do not explicitly measure this distinction, hindering effective dataset curation and real-world focused model development. We introduce Region Comprehension Index (RCI), the first model-based score to directly quantify a dataset's reliance on global versus local visual information. RCI systematically compares reference-model performance on image patches versus full images, revealing if tasks require holistic image understanding or can be solved with partial or localized visual cues. When applying RCI to 13 widely used multimodal benchmarks, we observed that most of them favor localized reasoning and exhibit significant spatial biases, indicating potential risks in real-world applications. RCI equips researchers & practitioners with an actionable tool for diagnosing & mitigating these biases, enabling the construction of datasets and benchmarks to foster the development of robust, enterprise-ready multimodal systems.

Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Multimodal reasoning, one of 17 directions in LLM reasoning. Builds on 29 of its 45 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 28 Sep 2025.

Builds on

29 of 45 references.

Closest ancestors · 3

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2024Expanding Performance Boundaries of Open-Source Multimodal Models with Model, Data, and Test-Time Scaling6 Dec
  2. 2022Learn to Explain: Multimodal Reasoning via Thought Chains for Science Question Answering20 Sep
  3. 2022ChartQA: A Benchmark for Question Answering about Charts with Visual and Logical Reasoning19 Mar

Other references · 26

  1. 2024Qwen2-VL: Enhancing Vision-Language Model's Perception of the World at Any Resolutioncited by 4,234
  2. 2021CLIPScore: A Reference-free Evaluation Metric for Image Captioningcited by 2,424
  3. 2014CIDEr: Consensus-based Image Description Evaluationcited by 2,046
  4. 2023Evaluating Object Hallucination in Large Vision-Language Modelscited by 1,729
  5. 2019Towards VQA Models That Can Readcited by 1,718
  6. 2023MME: A Comprehensive Evaluation Benchmark for Multimodal Large Language Modelscited by 1,652
  7. 2015Microsoft COCO Captions: Data Collection and Evaluation Servercited by 1,462
  8. 2024How Far Are We to GPT-4V? Closing the Gap to Commercial Multimodal Models with Open-Source Suitescited by 1,050
  9. 2024Are We on the Right Way for Evaluating Large Vision-Language Models?cited by 914
  10. 2018VizWiz Grand Challenge: Answering Visual Questions from Blind Peoplecited by 858
  11. 2016A Diagram Is Worth A Dozen Imagescited by 804
  12. 2023HallusionBench: An Advanced Diagnostic Suite for Entangled Language Hallucination and Visual Illusion in Large Vision-Language Modelscited by 583
14 more
  1. 2024BLINK: Multimodal Large Language Models Can See but Not Perceivecited by 550
  2. 2024Molmo and PixMo: Open Weights and Open Data for State-of-the-Art Vision-Language Modelscited by 329
  3. 2023AMBER: An LLM-free Multi-dimensional Benchmark for MLLMs Hallucination Evaluationcited by 300
  4. 2023What's "up" with vision-language models? Investigating their struggle with spatial reasoningcited by 254
  5. 2024Mini-InternVL: A Flexible-Transfer Pocket Multimodal Model with 5% Parameters and 90% Performancecited by 94
  6. 2019GQA: A New Dataset for Real-World Visual Reasoning and Compositional Question Answeringcited by 78
  7. 2024VSP: Assessing the dual challenges of perception and reasoning in spatial planning tasks for VLMscited by 47
  8. 2024Survey of Large Multimodal Model Datasets, Application Categories and Taxonomycited by 17
  9. 2024Probing Multimodal Large Language Models for Global and Local Semantic Representationscited by 12
  10. 2024LLM for Barcodes: Generating Diverse Synthetic Data for Identity Documentscited by 12
  11. 2024Enhancing Document AI Data Generation Through Graph-Based Synthetic Layoutscited by 12
  12. 2024RelationVLM: Making Large Vision-Language Models Understand Visual Relationscited by 9
  13. 2025Clinical QA 2.0: Multi-Task Learning for Answer Extraction and Categorizationcited by 9
  14. 2022Towards the Human Global Context: Does the Vision-Language Model Really Judge Like a Human Being?cited by 1

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 1; 2026: 1.

2 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2025MMSI-Bench: A Benchmark for Multi-Image Spatial Intelligence
  2. 2026WorldBench: A Challenging and Visually Diverse Multimodal Reasoning Benchmark
  3. 2024MMIU: Multimodal Multi-image Understanding for Evaluating Large Vision-Language Models
  4. 2026See2Think: Do Multimodal Models Really Use Intermediate Visual States?
  5. 2025VERIFY: A Benchmark of Visual Explanation and Reasoning for Investigating Multimodal Reasoning Fidelity
  6. 2025All-in-one: Understanding and Generation in Multimodal Reasoning with the MAIA Benchmark
  7. 2025Evaluating MLLMs with Multimodal Multi-image Reasoning Benchmark
  8. 2025Beyond Seeing: Evaluating Multimodal LLMs on Tool-Enabled Image Perception, Transformation, and Reasoning