Improving constraint-based discovery with robust propagation and reliable LLM priors
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Learning causal structure from observational data is central to scientific modeling and decision-making. Constraint-based methods aim to recover conditional independence (CI) relations in a causal directed acyclic graph (DAG). Classical approaches such as PC and subsequent methods orient v-structures first and then propagate edge directions from these seeds, assuming perfect CI tests and exhaustive search of separating subsets -- assumptions often violated in practice, leading to cascading errors in the final graph. Recent work has explored using large language models (LLMs) as experts, prompting sets of nodes for edge directions, and could augment edge orientation when assumptions are not met. However, such methods implicitly assume perfect experts, which is unrealistic for hallucination-prone LLMs. We propose MosaCD, a causal discovery method that propagates edges from a high-confidence set of seeds derived from both CI tests and LLM annotations. To filter hallucinations, we introduce shuffled queries that exploit LLMs' positional bias, retaining only high-confidence seeds. We then apply a novel confidence-down propagation strategy that orients the most reliable edges first, and can be integrated with any skeleton-based discovery method. Across multiple real-world graphs, MosaCD achieves higher accuracy in final graph construction than existing constraint-based methods, largely due to the improved reliability of initial seeds and robust propagation strategies.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 18 of its 42 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 28 Sep 2025.
Builds on
18 of 42 references.
References · 18
- 2023Large Language Models are not Fair Evaluatorscited by 1,085
- 2023SelfCheckGPT: Zero-Resource Black-Box Hallucination Detection for Generative Large Language Modelscited by 810
- 2018DAGs with NO TEARS: Continuous Optimization for Structure Learningcited by 752
- 2023Causal Reasoning and Large Language Models: Opening a New Frontier for Causalitycited by 353
- 2019DAG-GNN: DAG Structure Learning with Graph Neural Networkscited by 331
- 2023Large Language Models Sensitivity to The Order of Options in Multiple-Choice Questionscited by 263
- 2013Causal Inference and Causal Explanation with Background Knowledgecited by 170
- 2013Causal Inference in the Presence of Latent Variables and Selection Biascited by 166
- 2023R-Tuning: Instructing Large Language Models to Say `I Don't Know'cited by 111
- 2023Causal Order: The Key to Leveraging Imperfect Experts in Causal Inferencecited by 48
- 2024Integrating Large Language Models in Causal Discovery: A Statistical Causal Approachcited by 32
- 2024ALCM: Autonomous LLM-Augmented Causal Discovery Frameworkcited by 29
6 more
- 2024Fact-and-Reflection (FaR) Improves Confidence Calibration of Large Language Modelscited by 27
- 2023Causal Structure Learning Supervised by Large Language Modelcited by 21
- 2024Large Language Models for Constrained-Based Causal Discoverycited by 15
- 2016Improving Accuracy and Scalability of the PC Algorithm by Maximizing P-valuecited by 11
- 2023Optimizing Data-driven Causal Discovery Using Knowledge-guided Searchcited by 5
- 2025IGDA: Interactive Graph Discovery through Large Language Model Agentscited by 3
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.
1 paper.