Steering Prepositional Phrases in Language Models: A Case of with-headed Adjectival and Adverbial Complements in Gemma-2
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Language Models, when generating prepositional phrases, must often decide for whether their complements functions as an instrumental adjunct (describing the verb adverbially) or an attributive modifier (enriching the noun adjectivally), yet the internal mechanisms that resolve this split decision remain poorly understood. In this study, we conduct a targeted investigation into Gemma-2 to uncover and control the generation of prepositional complements. We assemble a prompt suite containing with-headed prepositional phrases whose contexts equally accommodate either an instrumental or attributive continuation, revealing a strong preference for an instrumental reading at a ratio of 3:4. To pinpoint individual attention heads that favor instrumental over attributive complements, we project activations into the vocabulary space. By scaling the value vector of a single attention head, we can shift the distribution of functional roles of complements, attenuating instruments to 33% while elevating attributes to 36%.
Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 31 of its 48 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 27 Sep 2025.
Builds on
31 of 48 references.
References · 31
- 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 60,361
- 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,399
- 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,419
- 2022PaLM: Scaling Language Modeling with Pathwayscited by 5,326
- 2022Locating and Editing Factual Associations in GPTcited by 2,691
- 2020Transformer Feed-Forward Layers Are Key-Value Memoriescited by 1,336
- 2022Interpretability in the Wild: a Circuit for Indirect Object Identification in GPT-2 smallcited by 1,165
- 2023Steering Llama 2 via Contrastive Activation Additioncited by 1,085
- 2022Mass-Editing Memory in a Transformercited by 1,001
- 2023Eliciting Latent Predictions from Transformers with the Tuned Lenscited by 623
- 2023Dissecting Recall of Factual Associations in Auto-Regressive Language Modelscited by 528
- 2018What you can cram into a single vector: Probing sentence embeddings for linguistic propertiescited by 457
19 more
- 2019What do you learn from context? Probing for sentence structure in contextualized word representationscited by 438
- 2024Gemma Scope: Open Sparse Autoencoders Everywhere All At Once on Gemma 2cited by 394
- 2016Assessing the Ability of LSTMs to Learn Syntax-Sensitive Dependenciescited by 354
- 2018Targeted Syntactic Evaluation of Language Modelscited by 242
- 2024Patchscopes: A Unifying Framework for Inspecting Hidden Representations of Language Modelscited by 235
- 2016Fine-grained Analysis of Sentence Embeddings Using Auxiliary Prediction Taskscited by 216
- 2023Causal Abstraction: A Theoretical Foundation for Mechanistic Interpretabilitycited by 205
- 2019Assessing BERT's Syntactic Abilitiescited by 192
- 2020A Systematic Assessment of Syntactic Generalization in Neural Language Modelscited by 165
- 2021Causal Analysis of Syntactic Agreement Mechanisms in Neural Language Modelscited by 131
- 2023Future Lens: Anticipating Subsequent Tokens from a Single Hidden Statecited by 121
- 2024What needs to go right for an induction head? A mechanistic study of in-context learning circuits and their formationcited by 89
- 2018What do RNN Language Models Learn about Filler-Gap Dependencies?cited by 86
- 2019Investigating BERT's Knowledge of Language: Five Analysis Methods with NPIscited by 58
- 2023Towards a Mechanistic Interpretation of Multi-Step Reasoning Capabilities of Language Modelscited by 50
- 2024A Mechanistic Analysis of a Transformer Trained on a Symbolic Multi-Step Reasoning Taskcited by 49
- 2023Characterizing Mechanisms for Factual Recall in Language Modelscited by 48
- 2018Verb Argument Structure Alternations in Word and Sentence Embeddingscited by 25
- 2025Trick or Neat: Adversarial Ambiguity and Language Model Evaluationcited by 3
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 2.
2 papers.