CompareBench: A Benchmark for Visual Comparison Reasoning in Vision-Language Models
On the map: LLM reasoning → Multimodal reasoning
Abstract (arXiv)
Visual comparison reasoning is a fundamental capability of vision-language models (VLMs), covering judgments of object quantity, geometric dimensions, spatial relations, and temporal order. Yet existing benchmarks rarely isolate comparison as a reasoning axis, leaving it unclear whether models can reliably perform comparative visual judgments. We introduce a benchmark suite organized around three top-level resources: TallyBench, a 2,000-image object counting benchmark; OmniCaps, a 716-image caption and tag resource; and CompareBench, a 1,200-QA visual comparison benchmark. CompareBench contains four sub-benchmarks spanning quantity, geometric, spatial, and temporal comparison, with the temporal component unifying historical scenes, landmarks, and public figures. Evaluating nine closed-source model routes from Anthropic, Google, and OpenAI on TallyBench and CompareBench reveals strong overall performance but persistent failures in counting, spatial reasoning, geometric comparison, and temporal ordering. These results show that visual comparison remains a systematic weakness of current VLMs and establish CompareBench as a focused benchmark for multimodal reasoning evaluation. All data, code, and prompts will be released at https://github.com/caijie0620/CompareBench.
Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Multimodal reasoning, one of 17 directions in LLM reasoning. Builds on 12 of its 16 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 25 Sep 2025.
Builds on
12 of 16 references.
Closest ancestors · 2
Same direction, newest first
- 2023MMBench: Is Your Multi-modal Model an All-around Player?12 Jul
- 2022Learn to Explain: Multimodal Reasoning via Thought Chains for Science Question Answering20 Sep
Other references · 10
- 2014Microsoft COCO: Common Objects in Contextcited by 17,608
- 2016CLEVR: A Diagnostic Dataset for Compositional Language and Elementary Visual Reasoningcited by 1,457
- 2023MM-Vet: Evaluating Large Multimodal Models for Integrated Capabilitiescited by 1,239
- 2024BLINK: Multimodal Large Language Models Can See but Not Perceivecited by 550
- 2023Teaching CLIP to Count to Tencited by 198
- 2017Drone-based Object Counting by Spatially Regularized Regional Proposal Networkcited by 156
- 2018TallyQA: Answering Complex Counting Questionscited by 153
- 2021Learning To Count Everythingcited by 150
- 2025SimpleVQA: Multimodal Factuality Evaluation for Multimodal Large Language Modelscited by 66
- 2023Open-world Text-specified Object Countingcited by 41
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 1; 2026: 2.
3 papers.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2025PairBench: Are Vision-Language Models Reliable at Comparing What They See?
- 2026CoRe: A Comprehensive Framework for Cross-Image Comparative Reasoning in Vision-Language Models
- 2024Benchmarking Multi-Image Understanding in Vision and Language Models: Perception, Knowledge, Reasoning, and Multi-Hop Reasoning
- 2024JourneyBench: A Challenging One-Stop Vision-Language Understanding Benchmark of Generated Images
- 2025VisChainBench: A Benchmark for Multi-Turn, Multi-Image Visual Reasoning Beyond Language Priors
- 2024UniBench: Visual Reasoning Requires Rethinking Vision-Language Beyond Scaling
- 2024MLLM-CompBench: A Comparative Reasoning Benchmark for Multimodal LLMs
- 2025VERIFY: A Benchmark of Visual Explanation and Reasoning for Investigating Multimodal Reasoning Fidelity