mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Beyond Western Politics: Cross-Cultural Benchmarks for Evaluating Partisan Associations in LLMs

arXiv 2509.22711 ↗First posted 24 Sep 2025cs.CY cs.HCcited by 2

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Partisan bias in LLMs has been evaluated to assess political leanings, typically through a broad lens and largely in Western contexts. We move beyond identifying general leanings to examine harmful, adversarial representational associations around political leaders and parties. To do so, we create datasets textitNeutQA-440 (non-adversarial prompts) and textitAdverQA-440 (adversarial prompts), which probe models for comparative plausibility judgments across the USA and India. Results show high susceptibility to biased partisan associations and pronounced asymmetries (e.g., substantially more favorable associations for U.S. Democrats than Republicans) alongside mixed-polarity concentration around India's BJP, highlighting systemic risks and motivating standardized, cross-cultural evaluation.

Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 24 Sep 2025.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 2.

2 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2025Steering Towards Fairness: Mitigating Political Bias in LLMs
  2. 2024Assessing Political Bias in Large Language Models
  3. 2025Examining Alignment of Large Language Models through Representative Heuristics: The Case of Political Stereotypes
  4. 2025Measuring Political Preferences in AI Systems: An Integrative Approach
  5. 2026Political Alignment in Large Language Models: A Multidimensional Audit of Psychometric Identity and Behavioral Bias
  6. 2026Who Would You Vote For? Auditing Political Alignment in LLMs: An Italian Case-Study
  7. 2025Better Aligned with Survey Respondents or Training Data? Unveiling Political Leanings of LLMs on U.S. Supreme Court Cases
  8. 2025Are LLMs (Really) Ideological? An IRT-based Analysis and Alignment Tool for Perceived Socio-Economic Bias in LLMs