mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Evaluating LLMs for Combinatorial Optimization: One-Phase and Two-Phase Heuristics for 2D Bin-Packing

arXiv 2509.22255 ↗First posted 26 Sep 2025cs.AIcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

This paper presents an evaluation framework for assessing Large Language Models' (LLMs) capabilities in combinatorial optimization, specifically addressing the 2D bin-packing problem. We introduce a systematic methodology that combines LLMs with evolutionary algorithms to generate and refine heuristic solutions iteratively. Through comprehensive experiments comparing LLM generated heuristics against traditional approaches (Finite First-Fit and Hybrid First-Fit), we demonstrate that LLMs can produce more efficient solutions while requiring fewer computational resources. Our evaluation reveals that GPT-4o achieves optimal solutions within two iterations, reducing average bin usage from 16 to 15 bins while improving space utilization from 0.76-0.78 to 0.83. This work contributes to understanding LLM evaluation in specialized domains and establishes benchmarks for assessing LLM performance in combinatorial optimization tasks.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 2 of its 13 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 26 Sep 2025.

Builds on

2 of 13 references.

References · 2

  1. 2023Machine Learning for the Multi-Dimensional Bin Packing Problem: Literature Review and Empirical Evaluationcited by 4
  2. 2025A Hierarchical Bin Packing Framework with Dual Manipulators via Heuristic Search and Deep Reinforcement Learningcited by 1

Built on by

Not cited yet.