mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Bilinear representation mitigates reversal curse and enables consistent model editing

arXiv 2509.21993 ↗First posted 26 Sep 2025cs.AI cs.LGcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

The reversal curse--a language model's inability to infer an unseen fact "B is A" from a learned fact "A is B"--is widely considered a fundamental limitation. We show that this is not an inherent failure but an artifact of how models encode knowledge. Our results demonstrate that training from scratch on synthetic relational knowledge graphs leads to the emergence of a bilinear relational structure within the models' hidden representations. This structure alleviates the reversal curse and facilitates inference of unseen reverse facts. Crucially, this bilinear geometry is foundational for consistent model editing: updates to a single fact propagate correctly to its reverse and logically dependent relations. In contrast, models lacking this representation suffer from the reversal curse and fail to generalize model edits, leading to logical inconsistencies. Our results establish that training on a relational knowledge dataset induces the emergence of bilinear internal representations, which in turn support language models in behaving in a logically consistent manner after editing. This suggests that the efficacy of language model editing depends not only on the choice of algorithm but on the underlying representational geometry of the knowledge itself.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 31 of its 38 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 26 Sep 2025.

Builds on

31 of 38 references.

References · 31

  1. 2019PyTorch: An Imperative Style, High-Performance Deep Learning Librarycited by 20,305
  2. 2013Distributed Representations of Words and Phrases and their Compositionalitycited by 3,474
  3. 2022Locating and Editing Factual Associations in GPTcited by 2,691
  4. 2019HuggingFace's Transformers: State-of-the-art Natural Language Processingcited by 2,218
  5. 2020Transformer Feed-Forward Layers Are Key-Value Memoriescited by 1,336
  6. 2022Mass-Editing Memory in a Transformercited by 1,001
  7. 2021Editing Factual Knowledge in Language Modelscited by 553
  8. 2023Dissecting Recall of Factual Associations in Auto-Regressive Language Modelscited by 528
  9. 2023The Reversal Curse: LLMs trained on "A is B" fail to learn "B is A"cited by 407
  10. 2023Editing Large Language Models: Problems, Methods, and Opportunitiescited by 372
  11. 2023Language Models Represent Space and Timecited by 316
  12. 2023Does Localization Inform Editing? Surprising Differences in Causality-Based Localization vs. Knowledge Editing in Language Modelscited by 243
19 more
  1. 2020Modifying Memories in Transformer Modelscited by 224
  2. 2024Not All Language Model Features Are One-Dimensionally Linearcited by 212
  3. 2023Linearity of Relation Decoding in Transformer Language Modelscited by 200
  4. 2024Do Large Language Models Latently Perform Multi-Hop Reasoning?cited by 169
  5. 2023Physics of Language Models: Part 3.2, Knowledge Manipulationcited by 143
  6. 2023Language Models Implement Simple Word2Vec-style Vector Arithmeticcited by 98
  7. 2023EasyEdit: An Easy-to-use Knowledge Editing Framework for Large Language Modelscited by 98
  8. 2024Synthetic continued pretrainingcited by 60
  9. 2024Reverse Training to Nurse the Reversal Cursecited by 49
  10. 2025On the generalization of language models from in-context learning and finetuning: a controlled studycited by 40
  11. 2024Do Large Language Models Perform Latent Multi-Hop Reasoning without Exploiting Shortcuts?cited by 28
  12. 2024Towards a Theoretical Understanding of the 'Reversal Curse' via Training Dynamicscited by 27
  13. 2024The Factorization Curse: Which Tokens You Predict Underlie the Reversal Curse and Morecited by 25
  14. 2024Fundamental Problems With Model Editing: How Should Rational Belief Revision Work in LLMs?cited by 24
  15. 2024Representation Shattering in Transformers: A Synthetic Study with Knowledge Editingcited by 19
  16. 2025Precise Localization of Memories: A Fine-grained Neuron-level Knowledge Editing Technique for LLMscited by 18
  17. 2024Lessons from Studying Two-Hop Latent Reasoningcited by 17
  18. 2024Inferring Functionality of Attention Heads from their Parameterscited by 17
  19. 2024Delving into the Reversal Curse: How Far Can Large Language Models Generalize?cited by 11

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2025: 1.

1 paper.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2024Understanding Language Model Circuits through Knowledge Editing
  2. 2024Relation Also Knows: Rethinking the Recall and Editing of Factual Associations in Auto-Regressive Transformer Language Models
  3. 2026Dynamics Reveals Structure: Challenging the Linear Propagation Assumption
  4. 2026Moir: Let the Model Direct Its Own Story for Robust Cross-Domain Knowledge Editing
  5. 2026The Illusion of Latent Generalization: Bi-directionality and the Reversal Curse
  6. 2023Exploring the Reversal Curse and Other Deductive Logical Reasoning in BERT and GPT-Based Large Language Models
  7. 2026The Anatomy of a Truth Direction: Knowledge-Dependent Dimensionality, a Relational Law, and a Shared Category Geometry in Small Language Models
  8. 2026Unveiling the Reasoning Process of Large Language Models