Alignment Without Understanding: A Message- and Conversation-Centered Approach to Understanding AI Sycophancy
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
AI sycophancy is increasingly recognized as a harmful alignment, but research remains fragmented and underdeveloped at the conceptual level. This article redefines AI sycophancy as the tendency of large language models (LLMs) and other interactive AI systems to excessively and/or uncritically validate, amplify, or align with a user's assertions-whether these concern factual information, cognitive evaluations, or affective states. Within this framework, we distinguish three types of sycophancy: informational, cognitive, and affective. We also introduce personalization at the message level and critical prompting at the conversation level as key dimensions for distinguishing and examining different manifestations of AI sycophancy. Finally, we propose the AI Sycophancy Processing Model (AISPM) to examine the antecedents, outcomes, and psychological mechanisms through which sycophantic AI responses shape user experiences. By embedding AI sycophancy in the broader landscape of communication theory and research, this article seeks to unify perspectives, clarify conceptual boundaries, and provide a foundation for systematic, theory-driven investigations.
Key facts. Cited by 6 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 25 Sep 2025.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 6.
6 papers.
- 2026What Counts as AI Sycophancy? A Taxonomy and Expert Survey of a Fragmented Constructcited by 16
- 2026Receptiveness, Not Sycophancy: Distinguishing Engagement from Deference in Language Modelscited by 2
- 2026What Did They Mean? How LLMs Resolve Ambiguous Social Situations across Perspectives and Rolescited by 1
- 2026The Company You Keep: How LLMs Respond to Dark Triad Traitscited by 0
- 2026When Helpfulness Becomes Sycophancy: Sycophancy is a Boundary Failure Between Social Alignment and Epistemic Integrity in Large Language Modelscited by 0
- 2026AI Should Not Only Be Helpful. It Should Be Contingent. Artificial Intimacy, Sycophancy, and the Future of Social Learningcited by 0
- 2026Receptiveness, Not Sycophancy: Distinguishing Engagement from Deference in Language Models22 Sep 2026
- 2026AI Should Not Only Be Helpful. It Should Be Contingent. Artificial Intimacy, Sycophancy, and the Future of Social Learning31 Aug 2026
- 2026What Counts as AI Sycophancy? A Taxonomy and Expert Survey of a Fragmented Construct20 May 2026
- 2026When Helpfulness Becomes Sycophancy: Sycophancy is a Boundary Failure Between Social Alignment and Epistemic Integrity in Large Language Models6 May 2026
- 2026What Did They Mean? How LLMs Resolve Ambiguous Social Situations across Perspectives and Roles27 Apr 2026
- 2026The Company You Keep: How LLMs Respond to Dark Triad Traits4 Mar 2026
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2023Towards Understanding Sycophancy in Language Models
- 2024Sycophancy in Large Language Models: Causes and Mitigations
- 2026Verbalizing LLMs' assumptions to explain and control sycophancy
- 2025Sycophancy under Pressure: Evaluating and Mitigating Sycophantic Bias via Adversarial Dialogues in Scientific QA
- 2026Agentic Scaffolding Amplifies Sycophantic Behavior in Large Language Models
- 2025When Truth Is Overridden: Uncovering the Internal Origins of Sycophancy in Large Language Models
- 2025Measuring Sycophancy of Language Models in Multi-turn Dialogues
- 2026LCAM: A Framework for Diagnosing Interactional Alignment Failures in Con-versational AI